FC Community
Discussion Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: joannaingram84 on May 13, 2012, 09:55:43 pm
-
Meanwhile, the crime rate was rising rapidly across the earth, and, as seen by God, the world was rotten to the core.
-
Meanwhile, the crime rate was rising rapidly across the earth, and, as seen by God, the world was rotten to the core.
Does your position as "g-d's" spokesperson pay well or, are you satisfied with hypothetical 'renumeration' in exchange for speaking for a hypothetical 'being'?
-
Falcon 9 if you have such a problem with my post why do you read them? Please lay off the negative comments or just stop reading the posts.
-
Falcon 9 if you have such a problem with my post why do you read them?
Why do you post them, if not tacitly proselytizing?
Please lay off the negative comments or just stop reading the posts.
You call challenging religious preconceptions "negative comments" and I call them unanswered questions. It's all a matter of perspective therefore, I'll offer a counter-suggestion; why not utilize the "ignore" function provided by FC?
-
I like your post. The earth is still corrupt and filled with violence today.
-
I like your post. The earth is still corrupt and filled with violence today.
"I don't like being stuck in this traffic-jam which is 'obviously' caused by everyone else except me." -- anon
-
(http://i.imgur.com/ciPM9.jpg)
We need to send a copy of this to Falcon,a.s.a.p! ;D
-
(http://i.imgur.com/ciPM9.jpg)
We need to send a copy of this to Falcon,a.s.a.p! ;D
Now see, your post is 'trolling'/calling out by 'nym/name - especially if you've got my posts on "ignore", (as you'd claimed). Such calling-out/trolling posts do not constitute 'ignoring'. Since you have repeatedly claimed to ignore while not ignoring, have Shatner recommend that you get further education. You cannot keep referring to 4th grade as your "senior year" forever.
-
Unfortunately Falcon9 seems to have a problem with anyone that doesn't agree with him. How sad.
-
Unfortunately Falcon9 seems to have a problem with anyone that doesn't agree with him. How sad.
Unfortunately, your assessment is inaccurate; I've never required anyone to agree with what I post. Nor does your passive-aggressive fabrication have anything whatsover to do contextually with the previous reply. I don't eveen require that you put more work into your reasoning skills or, lack thereof. That's very accomodating, nyet?
-
What was the original topic of this post? I forgot with all this "other" conversation.
-
What was the original topic of this post? I forgot with all this "other" conversation.
How was that possible given the thread title? Was it due to such "other conversation" related to dissenting with religious proselytiing by way of attempts to requote entire 'bibles' bit by bit or, a short attention-span?
-
No, it was just sarcasm.
-
No, it was just sarcasm.
Of course; just as my reply was, since I speak 'sarcasm' fluently.