FC Community

Discussion Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: joannaingram84 on May 13, 2012, 09:55:43 pm

Title: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: joannaingram84 on May 13, 2012, 09:55:43 pm
Meanwhile, the crime rate was rising rapidly across the earth, and, as seen by God, the world was rotten to the core.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 13, 2012, 10:04:41 pm
Meanwhile, the crime rate was rising rapidly across the earth, and, as seen by God, the world was rotten to the core.

Does your position as "g-d's" spokesperson pay well or, are you satisfied with hypothetical 'renumeration' in exchange for speaking for a hypothetical 'being'?
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: joannaingram84 on May 15, 2012, 11:41:29 pm
Falcon 9 if you have such a problem with my post why do you read them? Please lay off the negative comments or just stop reading the posts.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 15, 2012, 11:48:57 pm
Falcon 9 if you have such a problem with my post why do you read them?

Why do you post them, if not tacitly proselytizing?

Please lay off the negative comments or just stop reading the posts.

You call challenging religious preconceptions "negative comments" and I call them unanswered questions.  It's all a matter of perspective therefore, I'll offer a counter-suggestion; why not utilize the "ignore" function provided by FC?
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: sturner1964 on May 16, 2012, 05:42:10 am
I like your post. The earth is still corrupt and filled with violence today.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 16, 2012, 11:35:06 am
I like your post. The earth is still corrupt and filled with violence today.

"I don't like being stuck in this traffic-jam which is 'obviously' caused by everyone else except me." -- anon
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: JediJohnnie on May 18, 2012, 02:07:46 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/ciPM9.jpg)

We need to send a copy of this to Falcon,a.s.a.p! ;D
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 18, 2012, 02:39:27 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/ciPM9.jpg)

We need to send a copy of this to Falcon,a.s.a.p! ;D

Now see, your post is 'trolling'/calling out by 'nym/name - especially if you've got my posts on "ignore", (as you'd claimed).  Such calling-out/trolling posts do not constitute 'ignoring'.  Since you have repeatedly claimed to ignore while not ignoring, have Shatner recommend that you get further education.  You cannot keep referring to 4th grade as your "senior year" forever.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: bowrunner on May 18, 2012, 03:13:37 pm
Unfortunately Falcon9 seems to have a problem with anyone that doesn't agree with him.  How sad.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 18, 2012, 03:37:36 pm
Unfortunately Falcon9 seems to have a problem with anyone that doesn't agree with him.  How sad.

Unfortunately, your assessment is inaccurate; I've never required anyone to agree with what I post.  Nor does your passive-aggressive fabrication have anything whatsover to do contextually with the previous reply. I don't eveen require that you put more work into your reasoning skills or, lack thereof.  That's very accomodating, nyet?
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: quietpal on May 18, 2012, 03:58:09 pm
What was the original topic of this post? I forgot with all this "other" conversation.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 18, 2012, 04:01:59 pm
What was the original topic of this post? I forgot with all this "other" conversation.

How was that possible given the thread title?  Was it due to such "other conversation" related to dissenting with religious proselytiing by way of attempts to requote entire 'bibles' bit by bit or, a short attention-span?
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: quietpal on May 18, 2012, 04:08:37 pm
No, it was just sarcasm.
Title: Re: Genesis 6:11 (The Living Bible)
Post by: falcon9 on May 18, 2012, 04:11:34 pm
No, it was just sarcasm.

Of course; just as my reply was, since I speak 'sarcasm' fluently.