Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Flackle

Pages: 1
1
Off-Topic / Strangest Captchas
« on: April 20, 2013, 11:27:15 am »Message ID: 723695
What's the strangest Captchas you have ever had to type in? I just did one that stated "I like humans". Made it seem like my computer was trying to convince itself.

2
Debate & Discuss / The real actual totally 100% legitimate truth about prayer.
« on: March 16, 2013, 10:08:18 am »Message ID: 705368
I'd like to start off by saying that your god isn't real. Sorry.

With the massive influx of prayer-related threads as of late, I thought it would be most prudent to just make a thread to cover my overall dissenting viewpoint.

Praying doesn't solve anything. Praying is simply giving yourself false hope when you should in fact have real hope as a result of actually doing something to help a given situation. Don't pray that we may find a cure for cancer when you can take that same effort and fund raise for charity. Prayer has been shown to cause no affect to the outcome of an event. Prayer's effects, no matter how massive the number of people are involved, has never been scientifically shown to make a significant differences in the outcome of an event. You could argue its because god deems it so, (which is a very popular scapegoat used) but this argument is one that hurts prayer the most.

If god (assuming such a deity exist, and is in fact the god of the christian bible) is going to do whatever he/she/it wants too regardless of prayer, then what is the point of prayer exactly? I suppose you could say the whole point is just to "connect" to god (I wont get into the specifics of that argument as I'll just be going back to my previous statement that god isn't real). Just remember, though, if you believe that prayer is only used to connect to your god, then you must also be insulted by the influx of threads, posts, and the general ideology that's telling others that they can pray their problems away.

If you want to pray in your own house to make yourself feel better, that's fine. I don't support this action, but I'll leave you alone to do as you wish. When you start to tell others to pray instead of (or when they can be doing) doing something actually useful, then it becomes a problem and it needs to stop.

3
Debate & Discuss / Libertarianism
« on: October 28, 2011, 11:35:04 am »Message ID: 438399
Looking for arguments for an against the libertarian ideology. You may also discuss other miscellaneous political philosophies here if you'd like.

I, myself, describe my view to be mostly tied to libertarianism in general but in reality I am more independent then that.

4
Debate & Discuss / The origins of money
« on: August 30, 2011, 11:27:56 am »Message ID: 409061
I'm looking for a nice, heated economic/philosophical debate on what is money. Where does it come from? Is money determined by the market, or can only the government create currency? Is money separate from commodities, or is it one of them? What is the best form of currency? I'd like to see people put some research into it, and not base their beliefs solely on what someone else said.

5
Debate & Discuss / Does affirmative action work?
« on: August 16, 2011, 03:10:24 pm »Message ID: 402923
As the title says. I want to hear peoples opinions of affirmative action. Whether or not it works and where they believe such policies should or should not take place. I am looking for logical and reasonable arguments.

6
Debate & Discuss / Sex between consenting adults
« on: August 10, 2011, 10:07:51 am »Message ID: 399640
I am looking for arguments for and against things like incest, prostitution, and other means by which sex between to consenting adults is illegal. Please do not include children, animals or any other being which is incapable of giving consent. I also don't want people just saying that it feels wrong. I want logical and reasonable arguments.

7
Debate & Discuss / If you could govern your own country... V1
« on: June 02, 2011, 04:20:55 pm »Message ID: 362214
If you could create a country, what kind of government would run it? In this thread, I would like people to give a description of what kind of governance they would choose if they had the complete power to do so. I would request that anyone posting their imaginary country do so in a format similar to the one I created in bold. Names of your country and currency, flags, and facts (like national bird) may be added at your discretion. Other than posting one's country, posters are allowed to debate and discuss their ideas of governance amongst one another as they wish. You don't HAVE to make up your own country if you wish to debate amongst those who do. Otherwise this can be seen as a general political philosophy type thread. I would ask the posters to not mention specific real-life countries, and their laws. I wish to keep this thread as abstract as possible (For example, do not mention the PATRIOT act but instead discuss the general ideas of privacy, terrorism, and how the government should handle its domestic security.) I would also request that religion shouldn't be discussed as this may also distract the thread of its main goals. You may mention that your country allows none, one, many, or all religions and mention religion as long as you do not talk about any one in particular (For example, one may discuss that your country only allows one religion but do not mention that religion is Zoroastrianism. There are PLENTY of other threads to talk about whose religion is the right one, this thread isn't one of those.)


General form of Government: Republic (This may include any general names of government typesFor example: Monarchy, democracy, theology)
Government organization: A multi-branch form of governance where the branches rule power over one another, but no single branch has power over all other branches. The government is further organized to be Federalist. The main government embodiment is pitted against states organized by the Federal government and is recognized as having similar powers. The state is further divided by individual groups completely organized by free citizens. Their size and scope vary as they naturally occur overtime. These groups insure that individual rights are harder to take away by either the state or federal government. At the same time the federal government may protect each group from being taken over by another group through force. Citizens within groups are guaranteed to not to have their rights taken away by these groups and that they may move freely amongst them by the federal and state governments. This effectively pits many groups of governments against one another and divides power thorough a large number of complex levels that are, more or less, controlled completely by that people who live within these boundaries. Groups may divulge in their own laws, as the federal government only guarantees the most basic of human rights. But these groups may not take these rights away without the federal government. State governments act more like a medium between the federal government and the people. The state's duty is to keep any eye on groups and report to the federal government if trouble may occur. They also organize the records that keep tract of groups as they born and die. Voting is casted for most branches of government. The state gets to vote for their own people in one of the branches. Each group organized by the people may cast a vote to be equally represented in one of the branches of the federal government. The rest of the branches are to be voted in their own separate cycles by individual citizens. The organization of these votes are to be done by the states. (This section gives a detailed view of how your government is organized.) The court system is to be organized by the state and federal governments alone. The groups may only use this court system in their own legal dispute. Anytime a group is in violation of federal or state laws, it is the state they then takes the group to court.

Social Laws: Laws regarding social affairs are completely in the hands of the groups organized by the people. The legality of drugs, prostitution, gambling among other things vary between groups. The most popular will obviously have the most power as they represent the largest number of people. But smaller groups who represent a smaller number of people can still live in their ideal group. Overall the rights of individuals are, ideally, protected by all levels of government. Illegal actions within a group are to be regulated by this group alone. If firing a gun is illegal in one group, then one may be taken to court by that group alone. (This section gives a detailed view of how your government sets up laws regarding the social aspects of your country)

Economic Laws: Like the social laws, ones freedom in regards to how they purchase their personal property and how they are tax is mostly handed by the groups. The groups themselves have taxes levied by the state and federal governments to pay for the basic needs of the federal government. These taxes can be disputed amongst the many levels of government. It is overall accepted that goods and serves may be traded amongst individuals, but it still depends on the group the individual is located in. The individual still reserves the right to keep all personal property that they obtained legally from other groups and may leave with the same property. But trade amongst property may be regulated by the group. For example: In one group I was able to obtain drugs in exchange for the group's currency. I then move into another group with this property where drugs are illegal. The group may not steal my personal property away from me. But if I where to trade this cocaine for some bread then they may take this bread and the drugs away from me and the person I am trading with because drugs are illegal. Once you engage with trade within a group then they have the right to regulate this trade as they see fit. (Like the social laws, this section gives a detail view of how your government sets up laws regarding the economic and trade-related aspects of your country)


Overall, this is a decent example of how one should organize their post. I was of course unable to go into explicit detail and this view is by no means perfect. Feel free to post criticisms, questions, or comments of anyones country, or make up your own.

This is V1 of this thread. If it becomes popular enough I may revise this post later and update it.

Pages: 1