This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print

Topic: American Hostages Day - Nov. 4th  (Read 567 times)

sflynt

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Elite Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 870 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
American Hostages Day - Nov. 4th
« on: November 04, 2010, 07:34:34 am »
Did you know that today is American Hostages Day? In 1979 Iranian militants took 62 American hostages from the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Iran. The hostages were not freed until January 20, 1981. 444 days!!! Here's a bit from the website I was reading..

"On November 4, 1979, an angry mob of young Islamic revolutionaries overran the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, taking more than sixty Americans hostage. "From the moment the hostages were seized until they were released minutes after Ronald Reagan took the oath of office as president 444 days later," wrote historian Gaddis Smith, "the crisis absorbed more concentrated effort by American officials and had more extensive coverage on television and in the press than any other event since World War II."

The United States and Iran
The hostage crisis was the most dramatic in a series of problems facing Americans at home and abroad in the last year of the Carter presidency. Was Carter to blame for allowing it to happen? It's hard to say, since the hostage crisis was merely the latest event in the long and complex relationship between the United States and Iran.


Ever since oil was discovered there in 1908, Iran had attracted great interest from the West. The British played a dominant role there until World War II, when the Soviet Union joined them in fighting to keep the Germans out. Until 1953, the United States mostly stayed on the sidelines, advocating for an independent Iran under the leadership of the young king, Reza Shah Pahlavi. But that year, fearing that charismatic prime minister Mohammed Mossadegh might be moving Iran closer to Moscow, the CIA directed an operation to oust him and consolidate power under the Shah.

With a steady flow of oil from the ground and military equipment from the U.S., the Shah led Iran into a period of unprecedented prosperity. But growing resentment against an uneven distribution of wealth and the westernizing influence of the United States led to a confrontation with Islamic clergy in 1963. The Shah effectively put down the uprising, sending its leader, an elderly cleric named Ruhollah Khomeini, into exile in Iraq. Though no one knew it at the time, Iran's Islamic revolution had begun.

The Iranian Revolution
Fast forward to New Years Eve, 1977: President Carter toasted the Shah at a state dinner in Tehran, calling him "an island of stability" in the troubled Middle East. What the president also knew, but chose to ignore, was that the Shah was in serious trouble. As opposition to his government mounted, he had allowed his secret police, SAVAK, to crack down on dissenters, fueling still more resentment. Within weeks of Carter's visit, a series of protests broke out in the religious city of Qom, denouncing the Shah's regime as "anti-Islamic." The popular movement against the Shah grew until January 16, 1979, when he fled to Egypt. Two weeks later, thousands of Muslims cheered Khomeini's return to Iran after fourteen years in exile.

Did the Carter administration "lose" Iran, as some have suggested? Gaddis Smith might have put it best: "President Carter inherited an impossible situation -- and he and his advisers made the worst of it." Carter seemed to have a hard time deciding whether to heed the advice of his aggressive national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who wanted to encourage the Shah to brutally suppress the revolution, or that of his more cautious State Department, which suggested Carter reach out to opposition elements in order to smooth the transition to a new government. In the end he did neither, and suffered the consequences."


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/peopleevents/e_hostage.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis

« Last Edit: November 04, 2010, 09:51:46 am by sflynt »
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.

You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.

  • Print
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
1446 Views
Last post February 25, 2009, 09:57:22 pm
by gesus
American Idol

Started by sundance379 « 1 2 » in Off-Topic

15 Replies
4551 Views
Last post May 08, 2009, 07:07:48 am
by vlsm23
0 Replies
1151 Views
Last post April 15, 2009, 05:51:56 pm
by bbrmfletch
0 Replies
666 Views
Last post August 27, 2010, 01:10:51 pm
by ndumboski
5 Replies
522 Views
Last post January 03, 2015, 07:13:32 pm
by Liquidfire_43