I guess I just don't get how Falcon continues to harass ...Replying
to contentious posts with a dissenting viewpoint isn't 'harassing', (except in the skewed viewed of "johnny"-fundie, who would suppress such viewpoints were he able to).
people from thread to thread and still get away with it.I mean,the huge amount of complaints about his actions by many,many posters speaks for itself.
Indeed, it speaks to the apparent inability of the, (mainly xtian), complaintants who object to having their specious religious remarks challenged in an 'open' forum.
If I were to continually follow people who talk about something-anything-let's say cottage cheese for example- and I disrupted each and every conversation about the subject by using veiled and not-so veiled insults about people who like the subject-would that not be considered harrassment?
Cottage cheese opinions are not being contended; you're presenting a false dichotomy here. Further, it may not occur to your mind-blindness that a continuous flow of xtian proselytizing is 'rude', 'insulting' and contentious to others who don't share your particular religious beliefs. Dissent is not "harrassment" and falsely characterizing it constantly in a unfounded and biased manner is dishonest.
Isn't that the reason a D&D area was made in the first place?So people who don't want to debate endlessly can have a place to talk freely?
First of all, this thread occurs in the "Off-Topic" forum, not d+d. Secondly, there isn't a specifically-designated forum for posting unchallenged remarks; any post in the forums can be replied to if wished. Thirdly, the FC forums do not have a designated "specious religious comments" area and therefore, religious adherents spew such all over nearly every
forum, (not just Off-Topic or d+d). Any replies to these extraneous religious remarks, (whether concurring or dissenting points of view), would be in the forums those remarks were made. Summarily, replying to a post in the forum which that post appears is how such forum exchanges function, (rather than be dishonestly characterized as "following around" or "harrassing" just because the someone doesn't know how to use the FC 'ignore' function).