This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print

Topic: Ponder this for a sec  (Read 4309 times)

falcon9

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Logic ticks people off - isn't that ironic?
  • Posts: 9741 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
Re: Ponder this for a sec
« Reply #165 on: July 16, 2012, 01:42:55 pm »
And, the threads in the off-topic that included Bible inspiration, verses, thoughts, quotes, etc., were hardly ever messed with by those same posters who were always discussing and debating in the debate threads. 

Some of the joy of the off-topic threads has indeed waned mainly because of a couple who can't leave well enough alone of those who are trying to enjoy sharing a mutual topic.  At least there are several posters who just ignore those, if they don't apply, or only come in when they want to or feel they need to, to discuss something.  Thank goodness for their integrity and respect of others. 

There are no FC forums or threads which are exclusive xtian 'reservations' or private 'country clubs'.  Some xtians lacking integrity continue to treat them as if they were reservations or country clubs which exclude dissenting viewpoints.

*Where exactly did anyone say they are "exclusive Christian 'reservations' or private 'country clubs'?"  Please show the exact words, in the exact quotes, in the exact threads.

Read it again, the statement made was " ... as if they were ...".

*How do you know that "some" Christians lack integrity?

Some xtians have demonstrated a lack of integrity as opposed to merely accusing non-xtians of this as a slander, (which by itself, shows a lack of integrity).

*Where does it say, exactly, that there are to be no Bible threads made?  Or is it what you want?

What kind of false dichotomy are you trying to fabricate?  No one has stated that no bible/babble threads can be made.  Neither does it "say" anywhere that such threads cannot be opposed or dissented with in any way.  Or, is that what you're really after - unopposed proselytization?

*Where does it say, exactly, that "Falcon9 has complete control" over bashing any and all Bible threads, mainly off-topic threads that have nothing to do with him and do not have his name in the title?  Or is this based on Falcon9's desires?

Now you're just fabricating crap to sling.  Anyone can comment on any thread - the bible/babble ones included.  You don't get to control this and neither do I, (except for our own responses).  Threads do not have to have a member's name in the title to reply to them.  Are you an idiot?

*Where does it say, exactly, that Christians are not allowed to express their viewpoints and beliefs without being accused of "initial proselytizing" and therefore, should be bashed?  Prove, without a shadow of doubt, that they are indeed that very thing. 

It doesn't "say" that anywhere; xtians have no free pass for proselytizing which includes no opposition to it, (whether you call it 'bashing' from an inherent bias or not).  Initially posting religious propaganda is proselytization and others may oppose it if they choose to.  The religious fundies propagandizing do not have the power to suppress opposing viewpoints on these forums.
 
*Where does it say, exactly, that Falcon9 is the seemingly acting boss of accusing Christians of "initial proselytizing" when, in fact, he is doing "initial bashing" of Christians with their postings?  

If you're going to specifically 'flame' me because I'm a non-xtian opposing your superstitious religious beliefs, you'll undoubtedly not enjoy being 'flamed' in response.  More than likely, you'd whine about it, as if it were unprovoked. 

The fact of the matter is that xtians start biblical quoting and other religious proselytizing threads.  Starting a thread is initiating the subject/discussion, (in this instance, religious propaganda).  Replies which are in response to initial religious proselytizing are in oppostion to being "bashed" by superstitious beliefs in the first place.  Then you have a few of the same xtians who want their religious propagandizing to go unopposed inherently "bashing" other religious beliefs.
One can lead a horse to water however, if one holds the horse's head under, that horse will drown.

             


JediJohnnie

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • I'll never turn to the Dark Side.
  • Posts: 2100 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 80x
Re: Ponder this for a sec
« Reply #166 on: July 16, 2012, 03:44:51 pm »
It's Fusioncash.Not Falcon9cash. ;D

Google JediJohnnie and May the Force be with you!

falcon9

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Logic ticks people off - isn't that ironic?
  • Posts: 9741 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
Re: Ponder this for a sec
« Reply #167 on: July 16, 2012, 03:48:35 pm »
It's Fusioncash.Not Falcon9cash. ;D

Right; it's FusionCash, not 'fundiecashcow'.
One can lead a horse to water however, if one holds the horse's head under, that horse will drown.

             

hitch0403

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Silver Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1599 (since 2012)
  • Thanked: 39x
Re: Ponder this for a sec
« Reply #168 on: August 13, 2012, 09:44:19 pm »




 Brum you can always collect cans!!


   
Re: Ponder this for a sec
Reply #160 on: July 15, 2012, 05:33:57 pm Message ID: 571988
Quote
I'm running out of topics to pick from and I'm a few short of my 30.  If God destroyed adam and eve.  Shaaaaaazam!  If God destroyed adam and eve, he could just make another adam and eve.  The dude has a reset button.  I'm sure of it.  =-P
Flag this post for review     Logged

  • Print
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
367 Views
Last post December 11, 2009, 07:27:22 pm
by debraleesparks
Things to PONDER

Started by cateyes1 « 1 2 3 » in Off-Topic

30 Replies
998 Views
Last post August 18, 2012, 08:46:43 am
by diala84
14 Replies
302 Views
Last post November 05, 2013, 05:45:41 pm
by sherri89101
5 Replies
165 Views
Last post November 07, 2013, 06:14:08 am
by gaylasue