And, the threads in the off-topic that included Bible inspiration, verses, thoughts, quotes, etc., were hardly ever messed with by those same posters who were always discussing and debating in the debate threads.
Some of the joy of the off-topic threads has indeed waned mainly because of a couple who can't leave well enough alone of those who are trying to enjoy sharing a mutual topic. At least there are several posters who just ignore those, if they don't apply, or only come in when they want to or feel they need to, to discuss something. Thank goodness for their integrity and respect of others.
There are no FC forums or threads which are exclusive xtian 'reservations' or private 'country clubs'. Some xtians lacking integrity continue to treat them as if they were reservations or country clubs which exclude dissenting viewpoints.
*Where exactly did anyone say they are "exclusive Christian 'reservations' or private 'country clubs'?" Please show the exact words, in the exact quotes, in the exact threads.
Read it again, the statement made was " ... as if they were ...".
*How do you know that "some" Christians lack integrity?
Some xtians have demonstrated a lack of integrity as opposed to merely accusing non-xtians of this as a slander, (which by itself, shows a lack of integrity).
*Where does it say, exactly, that there are to be no Bible threads made? Or is it what you want?
What kind of false dichotomy are you trying to fabricate? No one has stated that no bible/babble threads can be made. Neither does it "say" anywhere that such threads cannot be opposed or dissented with in any way. Or, is that what you're really after - unopposed proselytization?
*Where does it say, exactly, that "Falcon9 has complete control" over bashing any and all Bible threads, mainly off-topic threads that have nothing to do with him and do not have his name in the title? Or is this based on Falcon9's desires?
Now you're just fabricating crap to sling. Anyone can comment on any thread - the bible/babble ones included. You don't get to control this and neither do I, (except for our own responses). Threads do not have to have a member's name in the title to reply to them. Are you an idiot?
*Where does it say, exactly, that Christians are not allowed to express their viewpoints and beliefs without being accused of "initial proselytizing" and therefore, should be bashed? Prove, without a shadow of doubt, that they are indeed that very thing.
It doesn't "say" that anywhere; xtians have no free pass for proselytizing which includes no opposition to it, (whether you call it 'bashing' from an inherent bias or not). Initially
posting religious propaganda is proselytization and others may oppose it if they choose to. The religious fundies propagandizing do not have the power to suppress opposing viewpoints on these forums.
*Where does it say, exactly, that Falcon9 is the seemingly acting boss of accusing Christians of "initial proselytizing" when, in fact, he is doing "initial bashing" of Christians with their postings?
If you're going to specifically 'flame' me because I'm a non-xtian opposing your superstitious religious beliefs, you'll undoubtedly not enjoy being 'flamed' in response. More than likely, you'd whine about it, as if it were unprovoked.
The fact of the matter is that xtians start
biblical quoting and other religious proselytizing threads. Starting a thread is initiating the subject/discussion, (in this instance, religious propaganda). Replies which are in response
to initial religious proselytizing are in oppostion to being "bashed" by superstitious beliefs in the first place. Then you have a few of the same xtians who want their religious propagandizing to go unopposed inherently "bashing" other religious beliefs.