It's unfortunate how few people know about economics and history...
The latest buzz words on this topic is having a "living wage" instead of a "minimum wage". A living wage is a wage at which a person not only can survive, but also includes the cost other "necessities" that aren't entirely needed to live like transportation, insurance, retirement funding, education, etc. In essence, those supporting this want everyone to be paid according to what they need. In exchange, that person will work to their fullest ability to perform their work. In other words:
From each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs.
Which is the slogan that a famous economist used to describe his theory.... Several countries later tried to adopt Karl Marx's economic theory. In order to effect such a social change, they needed to set up a strict police state in order to govern such things as placing what sector each person was to work in (so as to ensure that each person's abilities are utilized to their fullest potential), what goods and services are produced, how much money each person was paid, how hard each person worked, etc.
Years later, these countries have been shown to be much weak economically speaking than countries that hold freedom and capitalism in higher esteem, and was one of the major driving forces that caused the collapse of the Soviet Union. Such a system tends to stifle innovation, risk-taking, personal betterment, and general motivation. If the person working next to you gets paid the same amount as you regardless of how efficient you are or whether you create a new process that allows you to create more product, you aren't incentivized to do better. In fact you would probably not even risk trying out that new process you think might increase your production, for if that innovation failed you will be penalized for not meeting production expectations which may include possible jail time.