FC Community
Discussion Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: 2005beneva on July 09, 2009, 10:34:48 am
-
Is the two kids really Michaels kids or the bodyguard kids?
I my self think they are he's kids
Give me your opinion or some facts
-
i think theyre acutally his kids
-
Yeah, they're his. The little girl especially. Do you remember how she cried at his funeral?
-
He's the father.. not the sperm doner. There's a BIG difference.
-
Definitely HIS--They look like him. Anyway, he'll always be their Daddy. It;s obvious they loved him VERY much.
-
I think the older boy looks like him and even the youngest boy. But they say that when people live together for a long time they start to look alike. My cousin and his wife adopted two girls and no one can tell them his wife didn't birth those kids because they look exactly like his wife even though they are not their bio kids.
-
I think the girl looks like Debbie Rowe (the supposed mom), the boys both resemble michael a little bit, esp. the youngest one. The kids are all really white, but then again a lot of people in the Jackson family dont seem to be that dark skinned. The rumor is that the bio. father is his dermatologist.
-
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it wasn't HIS sperm that made those kids... but they are Debbie Rowe's kids. She was artifically inseminated.
-
Okay Debbie Rowe is the mother, and Michael's plastic surgeon is the sperm donor. Debbie Rowe was the secretary of the plastic surgeon. :thumbsup:
-
Debbie Rowe is the biological mother of the 2 oldest kids. The father is a dermatologist that Rowe worked with previously -- in other words, Michael Jackson is not the biological father of those 2.
Michael Jackson provided sperm for a surrogate mother (via IV fertilization) who gave birth to the 3rd child, the youngest one (that's why the little one looks so much like him). It is unknown who the surrogate is. But yeah, Michael is the biological father of only ONE of his kids.
Nevertheless...biological out of the way... Michael was the one and only father all 3 kids have ever known. He had legal custody of them and raised them as his own, despite the older 2 who are not biologically connected to him. They obviously loved him very much and it's sad they will live their remaining lives without him. Any close death in a family is hard...and it's no different with this family. My sympathies.
-
They are Micheal's kids. Does it really matter if they are not biologically his. Why does the media have to make such a big deal about the kids. I believe that some things need to just remain private no matter what.
-
They are Micheal's kids. Does it really matter if they are not biologically his. Why does the media have to make such a big deal about the kids. I believe that some things need to just remain private no matter what.
I agree with you 100%. They are young and just suffered the huge loss of their Dad. No matter what people think of him, good or bad, that was their Dad. I could never imagine losing my Dad, and feel so bad that they are being made a specticle of.
I was only commenting to simply answer the question. :angel12: