FC Community
Discussion Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: cateyes1 on November 19, 2021, 01:52:24 pm
-
What do you think of the verdict? I myself thought it was self defense after watching the trial. What do you all think?
-
Didn't watch it closely to be honest, but from what it sounds like, seems like self-defense
-
Even tho he got acquitted,too bad from the start he didnt heed this advice.
Proverbs 22:3
New International Version
3 The prudent see danger and take refuge,
but the simple keep going and pay the penalty.
God will be our final judge.If he wasnt there he would never have drawn the sword.But there are some that prefer that as well.
-
God will be our final judge.
= the only thing that any of those who would either acquit or convict this young man need to bother themselves with...
-
God will be our final judge.
= the only thing that any of those who would either acquit or convict this young man need to bother themselves with...
UGP,this world doesnt know or take to heart Jesus words to Peter.Here Peter was actually defending him and Jesus scolded him for drawing his sword.Yes i know ignorance exists and many are blinded by Satans snares,but if you get a chance there is a pic of him carrying that weapon with a look on his face that said he couldnt wait to use it.
Hopefully down the rd he humbles himself before God and asks for forgivness.
A jury of imperfect people will NOT be a lasting judgement.
-
Justice was not served if you asked me. He should have been convicted. The judge was flipping crazy as well.
-
Justice was not served if you asked me. He should have been convicted. The judge was flipping crazy as well.
Did you actually watch the trial? Or did you follow what the left and main stream media said and make your conclusion from theirs? There's a world of difference between the truth and political bias.
Could you elaborate on the facts of the case that would insinuate in any way his guilt? If not, I'd hate to see you go on any jury trial. It requires being able to say that the jury had "proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." Were you aware of that? It's not supposed to be easy to just say someone is guilty and then convict them. Our justice system has stated that we are innocent until proven guilty. The operable word being proven.
And could you explain why you would imply that the judge in the case was "flipping crazy." I'd like to see if you would be able to walk a mile in his shoes. :-\ If you actually watched the trial and have ever participated in acknowledging actual facts, I don't know how you could convict him. I hope you're never called for jury duty. And I hope you're never on trial with people with viewpoints like yours on the jury. :monkey:
-
Justice was not served if you asked me. He should have been convicted. The judge was flipping crazy as well.
I am sorry to see you got scolded.
If you noticed earlier in the week 2 men got acquitted of the murder of Malcomb X from 50 yrs ago.Just another blown decision from the manmade justice system.
Funny how they ask you to put your hand on a bible in court LOL!
Im not sure what you based your opinion on the Rittenhouse trial,but if "In God we trust"was supported he would be guilty of killing 2 people based on what Jesus told Peter RE those that draw the sword.
You have others here that nationalism is their god and we know from the bible Satan is the god of this system and promotes nationalism.
Jesus said RE his father,"Your word is truth".
Your opinion was 100% right, he was guilty and its backed up by the TRUE God,not this worlds manmade/Satanic system.
Math 26:52-53 backs up Jesus words RE the sword.
-
I agreed with the verdict.
-
I didn't follow the trial but ya know if he proved of self defense, he had a jury trial.
-
Instead of being in jail Rittenhouse will pay the price looking over his shoulder.
To those that supported him i wonder if your loved ones were the victims what tune you would sing?
-
Your opinion was 100% right, he was guilty and its backed up by the TRUE God,not this worlds manmade/Satanic system.
Math 26:52-53 backs up Jesus words RE the sword.
What happened to GOD is the only true judge? Sounds like you are being a bit hypocritical here. Is it okay to judge if you agree with the politics of the accusers, but not okay if you are more in line with the other side?
-
I am always amazed by the folks who think they know better than the jury who sat through the entire trial and examined the evidence hands on. Most of the people out there have absolutely NO idea what any of the evidence showed and merely parrot back what was spoon fed to them by an agenda based news media. They see tiny snippets of what was actually painstakingly covered by professionally trained attorneys and testified to by expert witnesses...
The Media Has An Agenda. What they show to you is craftily edited to emphasize their agenda.
I will include this disclaimer. I did not watch a single millisecond of the Rittenhouse trial. I was not interested in any spin or bias. I have no personal opinion on whether he was guilty or not guilty because I did not see the evidence and I also knew there would likely be further violence and rioting by certain factions regardless of the verdict.
But those who voice opinions that they know better than the jury (without sitting in the jury box themselves) are 100% spiteful arrogant idiots. This goes for anyone on either side who said before the trial even started that Kyle Rittenhouse is 100% guilty or 100% innocent. Anyone who says: "If I was on that jury, I would have convicted him in five minutes" (or vice versa as to not-guilty) has zero business being on a jury and I thank God that there are both prosecutors and defense attorneys with enough wisdom and common sense to weed those kind of people out.
Anyone in here who says that the jury got it wrong, excuse me for my harshness, but you were not on that jury and your media tainted opinion means absolute *bleep*.
-
Your opinion was 100% right, he was guilty and its backed up by the TRUE God,not this worlds manmade/Satanic system.
Math 26:52-53 backs up Jesus words RE the sword.
What happened to GOD is the only true judge? Sounds like you are being a bit hypocritical here. Is it okay to judge if you agree with the politics of the accusers, but not okay if you are more in line with the other side?
My answer was 100% biblical.
The difference between you and i is i support what Gods word says 100%.That has been proven already from getting to know you and have seen where you dont support entirely what bible says as well as some others here.
You dont,As the majority of this world does.
I am a sinner just like you,but i know JUSTICE belongs to Jehovah,NOT man!!!You see it all the time......convictions overturned!!
I also discerned that his intentions being there were foolish by Gods word and as i mentioned in a pic i saw of him he was relishing carrying that weapon to the point he used it!!
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1968406
-
My answer was 100% biblical.
The difference between you and i is i support what Gods word says 100%.That has been proven already from getting to know you and have seen where you dont support entirely what bible says as well as some others here.
You dont,As the majority of this world does.
Just to be precise, you 100% support the JW.org interpretation of God's Word. Just because I don't 100% support the same interpretation of that Word does NOT mean that I do not support God's Word...
i know that you will disagree with that distinction, but it is a distinction nonetheless.
-
My answer was 100% biblical.
The difference between you and i is i support what Gods word says 100%.That has been proven already from getting to know you and have seen where you dont support entirely what bible says as well as some others here.
You dont,As the majority of this world does.
Just to be precise, you 100% support the JW.org interpretation of God's Word. Just because I don't 100% support the same interpretation of that Word does NOT mean that I do not support God's Word...
i know that you will disagree with that distinction, but it is a distinction nonetheless.
LOLLLLL!!!
So your interpetation of Jesus reply on the sword is different?LOL!!!Pretty ABC to me LOL!!!
I guess your interpetation on blood issue is too when God forbids that too?LOL!!
Ill stop there!!!
-
I guess UGP you must have thought Jesus meant it literally about a camel going thru the eye of a needle too!!LOL!
-
Nope.
-
I just found out that Trump supported Rittenhouse.
That makes all the sense in the world RE Trumps cronies backing him.
His word is godly to them.
-
The verdict was fair. Still how can. A. 17yr old. Get a gun.
-
That kid had no business being there in the first place.
-
That kid had no business being there in the first place.
Correct BB!!
Not only was he there,but he just happened to bring his gun with him too.
God is not one to be mocked.Whatever a person sows they will also reap.
-
Better late to the party than ever. That trial should of never of happen. The presecuter knew he had no case and he went with it anyway. His own witnesses vouched for Kyles actions. Once they did that I had feeling how was going to go. This case was all political. Even down to the stooge who was caught trailing the jurors bus. Down to the people trying to take pictures with there phones of every juror in that court room just to try and intimidate them. The whole thing was a witch hunt to try and prove a point that one side could dictate the outcome of a trial outcome and failed miserably
-
That kid had no business being there in the first place.
He was trying to help his community and I see nothing wrong with that.
-
The kid was used and abused. Some people say he shouldn't of been there well he worked there and his father lives there. In all honesty the rioters should of never been there not one of them even lived in that state. In fact arrest records have shown most of them came from a previous riot in another blue city earlier that day just to hop on a flight to go to Kenosha. Trial was pure politcal circus
-
The kid was used and abused. Some people say he shouldn't of been there well he worked there and his father lives there. In all honesty the rioters should of never been there not one of them even lived in that state. In fact arrest records have shown most of them came from a previous riot in another blue city earlier that day just to hop on a flight to go to Kenosha. Trial was pure politcal circus
Amen I so agree with you !!
-
I didn't watch the trial but I would do that now before forming an opinion.
-
The kid was used and abused. Some people say he shouldn't have been there well he worked there and his father lives there. In all honesty the rioters should have never been there not one of them even lived in that state. In fact, arrest records have shown most of them came from a previous riot in another blue city earlier that day just to hop on a flight to go to Kenosha. Trial was pure political circus
I didn't know that. It just seems like the people who are against the verdict are more concerned with the fact that a white kid crossed state lines with gun, killed people and got away with it instead of the circumstances that required him to defend himself in the first place.
-
Rioters should be punished.Thats the job for police.
Many of you celebrate a pagan holiday that 12/25 is the birth of Jesus,yet his words those that draw the sword will perish by it....you ignore.
Might be time to examine your morals.
God will judge Rittenhouse ignorance if that prevailed there....otherwise he is guilty and had NO right to kill in Gods eyes!
An answer when mild turns away rage is better then carrying a gun!!And concealing yourself is wise when a calamity looms.!
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
But it's ok if 1 of them raped a child and beat his Grandmother. It was self defense
-
I don't know enough about this case to make an informed judgement. I can only trust the jury about the verdict because they were the ones who listened to all the evidence.
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
You cannot fire a jury.
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
But it's ok if 1 of them raped a child and beat his Grandmother. It was self defense
Maybe there is more i dont know RE this case.
Are you saying that 1 of the victims killed raped a child and beat his grandma?And then it was OK for Rittenhouse to pass judgement?
On another note i will bet if a loved one of yours was killed in this manner you would find Rittenhouse guilty.
Just remember,the apostle Peter was trying to protect and defend Jesus when he used his sword.Jesus scolded him.
Those that defend Rittenhouse and say they support bible are a bit confused to what it really teaches.
-
I think that it was self defense to.
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
But it's ok if 1 of them raped a child and beat his Grandmother. It was self defense
Maybe there is more i dont know RE this case.
Are you saying that 1 of the victims killed raped a child and beat his grandma?And then it was OK for Rittenhouse to pass judgement?
On another note i will bet if a loved one of yours was killed in this manner you would find Rittenhouse guilty.
Just remember,the apostle Peter was trying to protect and defend Jesus when he used his sword.Jesus scolded him.
Those that defend Rittenhouse and say they support bible are a bit confused to what it really teaches.
Yes, you admitted you don't seem to know a lot about this trial, yet you passed judgement on Rittenhouse. You give the impression that others are confused about what the bible really teaches. I think you are a little confused. What does it say about a person passing judgement on someone?
All three that were shot attacked Rittenhouse and all three all had criminal records. So you follow the bible so you don't believe anyone should defend themselves if attacked? that's what you seem to be saying. I don't agree with that. Would you allow yourself to be beaten or killed if someone attacked you? I doubt it. Humans have a need of survive and do whatever they can to survive. It's built-in to our psychs and not "refundable. "
I won't go into the detail about the attacks now but Rittenhouse did not "bring" a gun to Kenosha across state lines as others are saying. That was certain media that, from the very beginning, attacked him as a white supremacist. Yet, when the truth came out that certain media did not apologize or retract their statements. They are still sticking to the lies they made from the beginning.
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
But it's ok if 1 of them raped a child and beat his Grandmother. It was self defense
Maybe there is more i dont know RE this case.
Are you saying that 1 of the victims killed raped a child and beat his grandma?And then it was OK for Rittenhouse to pass judgement?
On another note i will bet if a loved one of yours was killed in this manner you would find Rittenhouse guilty.
Just remember,the apostle Peter was trying to protect and defend Jesus when he used his sword.Jesus scolded him.
Those that defend Rittenhouse and say they support bible are a bit confused to what it really teaches.
Yes, you admitted you don't seem to know a lot about this trial, yet you passed judgement on Rittenhouse. You give the impression that others are confused about what the bible really teaches. I think you are a little confused. What does it say about a person passing judgement on someone?
All three that were shot attacked Rittenhouse and all three all had criminal records. So you follow the bible so you don't believe anyone should defend themselves if attacked? that's what you seem to be saying. I don't agree with that. Would you allow yourself to be beaten or killed if someone attacked you? I doubt it. Humans have a need of survive and do whatever they can to survive. It's built-in to our psychs and not "refundable. "
I won't go into the detail about the attacks now but Rittenhouse did not "bring" a gun to Kenosha across state lines as others are saying. That was certain media that, from the very beginning, attacked him as a white supremacist. Yet, when the truth came out that certain media did not apologize or retract their statements. They are still sticking to the lies they made from the beginning.
We will keep this short.You support Trump,Trump supported Rittenhouse.The pic of Trump holding up the bible is a classic joke.
Jesus said if you draw the sword you will perish.A no-brainer.
I will defend myself,my family and others and hopefully NOT kill anyone.Im sure Rittenhouse was looking just to wound somebody.<sarcasm>
Just admit you suppport Trump and dont support what Jesus said.
I dont support Trump and support Jesus.Pretty clear!!!
You just judged me.Not sure if Trump influenced you here or if you wanna decide whats good and bad.
I supported what Jesus said.I gave the example if i got drafted in 1971 and went to Vietnam and knew bible truths i woulda went to jail before i killed.I was fortunate the birthday lottery was high enuff i didnt get drafted that Nixon and congress implemented.I didnt know truth then.
Rittenhouse is guilty by Jehovahs laws.Maybe he was ignorant of that and forgivness can be granted.Im sure in his heart he wanted to use that gun.His expression told a 1000 words to me what i saw.
Your opinion is political.Mine is based on the bible i am PROUD to say.
-
The Monster who shot 3 people and 2 died was not self defense. It was murder and the Judge and jurors who released him should be fired.
But it's ok if 1 of them raped a child and beat his Grandmother. It was self defense
Maybe there is more i dont know RE this case.
Are you saying that 1 of the victims killed raped a child and beat his grandma?And then it was OK for Rittenhouse to pass judgement?
On another note i will bet if a loved one of yours was killed in this manner you would find Rittenhouse guilty.
Just remember,the apostle Peter was trying to protect and defend Jesus when he used his sword.Jesus scolded him.
Those that defend Rittenhouse and say they support bible are a bit confused to what it really teaches.
Yes, you admitted you don't seem to know a lot about this trial, yet you passed judgement on Rittenhouse. You give the impression that others are confused about what the bible really teaches. I think you are a little confused. What does it say about a person passing judgement on someone?
All three that were shot attacked Rittenhouse and all three all had criminal records. So you follow the bible so you don't believe anyone should defend themselves if attacked? that's what you seem to be saying. I don't agree with that. Would you allow yourself to be beaten or killed if someone attacked you? I doubt it. Humans have a need of survive and do whatever they can to survive. It's built-in to our psychs and not "refundable. "
I won't go into the detail about the attacks now but Rittenhouse did not "bring" a gun to Kenosha across state lines as others are saying. That was certain media that, from the very beginning, attacked him as a white supremacist. Yet, when the truth came out that certain media did not apologize or retract their statements. They are still sticking to the lies they made from the beginning.
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1975086
Try understanding passing judgement.
If you had a loved one that had a serious drug habit and they became a thief to support it,would you just keep quiet or if you cared would you pass judgement on them to them to help them?
-
It is getting really deep in here...
-
It is getting really deep in here...
Anybody have any boots I can borrow ?
-
It is getting really deep in here...
Anybody have any boots I can borrow ?
You created the post and asked for an opinion of others.I gave you mine based on what Jesus said.Sorry if you think what he said you need to wear boots.
But NOT surprised in the Godless world we live in.
You might just get a boot........but NOT to wear.
-
It is getting really deep in here...
Donna did you watch ANY of the trial?
Anybody have any boots I can borrow ?
You created the post and asked for an opinion of others.I gave you mine based on what Jesus said.Sorry if you think what he said you need to wear boots.
But NOT surprised in the Godless world we live in.
You might just get a boot........but NOT to wear.
-
It is getting really deep in here...
Donna did you watch ANY of the trial?
Anybody have any boots I can borrow ?
You created the post and asked for an opinion of others.I gave you mine based on what Jesus said.Sorry if you think what he said you need to wear boots.
But NOT surprised in the Godless world we live in.
You might just get a boot........but NOT to wear.
I only read in the newspaper of the trial.
But if i based my opinion on what Jesus said what difference does that make?NO one has the right to take anothers life and there are police to keep rioters in order.He didnt belong there.
He went there armed and i saw a proud look on his face carrying that weapon.
A wise proverb says those that see the calamity will conceal himself.That certainly didnt pertain to him.He clearly wanted to involve himself by being there.Truly in Gods eyes he is guilty and HE is the ONLY justice that means anything as far as our lives are concerned,NOT some manmade jury that doesnt get it right some of the time.
-
Jehovah knows our hearts better then we do.If we had to defend ourselves or our family and killed someone when doing so God will know what our TRUE intentions were and if they were justified in doing so.
In the case of Rittenhouse he was probably guilty even before he pulled the trigger.
Jesus said we committ adultry even just with our eyes by the desire to do so.
If i was on that jury based on biblical knowledge he was surely guilty.
-
Hey UGP,i think i know your opinion of the Rittenhouse verdict,but not quite 100% sure.
Mind if i ask you what you thought?
-
It is getting really deep in here...
Donna did you watch ANY of the trial?
Anybody have any boots I can borrow ?
You created the post and asked for an opinion of others.I gave you mine based on what Jesus said.Sorry if you think what he said you need to wear boots.
But NOT surprised in the Godless world we live in.
You might just get a boot........but NOT to wear.
I only read in the newspaper of the trial.
But if i based my opinion on what Jesus said what difference does that make?NO one has the right to take anothers life and there are police to keep rioters in order.He didnt belong there.
He went there armed and i saw a proud look on his face carrying that weapon.
A wise proverb says those that see the calamity will conceal himself.That certainly didnt pertain to him.He clearly wanted to involve himself by being there.Truly in Gods eyes he is guilty and HE is the ONLY justice that means anything as far as our lives are concerned,NOT some manmade jury that doesnt get it right some of the time.
But it is ok if they tried to take Kyles life? it was either Kyles life or the rapist life, I applaud Kyle for taking a dangerous person off the streets. NOW if this was YOUR son Donna, would you not want him to DEFEND himself? be honest now !!
Did you not hear he was there early that morning helping to clean up the mess those thugs did? YOU are so wrong on so many levels !!
-
It is getting really deep in here...
Donna did you watch ANY of the trial?
Anybody have any boots I can borrow ?
You created the post and asked for an opinion of others.I gave you mine based on what Jesus said.Sorry if you think what he said you need to wear boots.
But NOT surprised in the Godless world we live in.
You might just get a boot........but NOT to wear.
I only read in the newspaper of the trial.
But if i based my opinion on what Jesus said what difference does that make?NO one has the right to take anothers life and there are police to keep rioters in order.He didnt belong there.
He went there armed and i saw a proud look on his face carrying that weapon.
A wise proverb says those that see the calamity will conceal himself.That certainly didnt pertain to him.He clearly wanted to involve himself by being there.Truly in Gods eyes he is guilty and HE is the ONLY justice that means anything as far as our lives are concerned,NOT some manmade jury that doesnt get it right some of the time.
But it is ok if they tried to take Kyles life? it was either Kyles life or the rapist life, I applaud Kyle for taking a dangerous person off the streets. NOW if this was YOUR son Donna, would you not want him to DEFEND himself? be honest now !!
Did you not hear he was there early that morning helping to clean up the mess those thugs did? YOU are so wrong on so many levels !!
Dont say i am wrong Cat....you dont agree what bible says.I based my answer on that.You dont agree with what Jesus said RE the sword but i wonder if you support pagan Xmas?
NO one has the right to take a life.God has allowed mankind to enforce the law for now.As said many times he shouldnt have been there.Yes we all have the right to defend ourselves and NOT kill if possible.God can judge his final actions.If he saw the calamity and concealed himself to begin with none of this would have happened.You wanna build a statue to him thats your business.Again i used my knowledge of our RIGHTFUL and final judge.....Jehovah.
You make me laugh when you say he was there to clean up the mess.....oh i guess he decided a rifle was better then a broom!!LOL!
Again there are police and other authorities hopefully to quench the matter.
Jehovah knows the matter better then ALL of us if he acted out of ignorance to be forgiven or to kill for his judgement.
-
Hey UGP,i think i know your opinion of the Rittenhouse verdict,but not quite 100% sure.
Mind if i ask you what you thought?
To be 100% honest - I did not follow the trial at all and only saw small bits of media coverage of the incident (in which I believe the media most likely presented it as a slanted piece to support their anti gun liberal agenda). Given those two points, I truly do not have an opinion on the verdict, except to say that I have to trust that the jury did what they were supposed to do. I do not know enough about the evidence or testimony to say for sure one way or the other.
-
Kyle had as much right to be there as the others. I just dont get why you keep dancing around my question. If this was your son would you rather him die as apposed to a child rapist and someone who beat up his Grandmother? I bet you didnt see any of the trial.
-
Hey UGP,i think i know your opinion of the Rittenhouse verdict,but not quite 100% sure.
Mind if i ask you what you thought?
To be 100% honest - I did not follow the trial at all and only saw small bits of media coverage of the incident (in which I believe the media most likely presented it as a slanted piece to support their anti gun liberal agenda). Given those two points, I truly do not have an opinion on the verdict, except to say that I have to trust that the jury did
what they were supposed to do. I do not know enough about the evidence or testimony to say for sure one way or the other.
There are going to be many lawsuits because of how the media portrayed this young man.
-
Hey UGP,i think i know your opinion of the Rittenhouse verdict,but not quite 100% sure.
Mind if i ask you what you thought?
To be 100% honest - I did not follow the trial at all and only saw small bits of media coverage of the incident (in which I believe the media most likely presented it as a slanted piece to support their anti gun liberal agenda). Given those two points, I truly do not have an opinion on the verdict, except to say that I have to trust that the jury did what they were supposed to do. I do not know enough about the evidence or testimony to say for sure one way or the other.
[/quoteTY for the honest answer.
Id like to just ask you 1 more thing.You obviously know the Jesus/sword account in the bible and that manmade juries get it wrong sometimes.Does that mean anything to you?
Im not going to scold you for your answer.I just want you to know i based my answer on that 100% and i also saw a pic of him carrying that gun and his look on his face.He is NOT a cop and the bible proverb seeing the calamity and concealing himself is wisdom at its finest.I was just wondering if U agree?
-
Kyle had as much right to be there as the others. I just dont get why you keep dancing around my question. If this was your son would you rather him die as apposed to a child rapist and someone who beat up his Grandmother? I bet you didnt see any of the trial.
I answered you.I told you i read the Daily News article.
I also answered you RE my son.There are ways to defuse a situation.If you tried to defend yourself with NO intent to kill and you killed i would let Jehovah be the judge.
You speak as if the others deserved to die.Then why were they not in jail to begin with?
Vengeance is mine says God in the bible.He is the only one that justifies who lives and who dies.
If you disagree with me then you OBVIOUSLY disagree with Gods word.But what else is new in this world?So many are blinded by Satan and have selfish motives of course they could care less what Jehovah thinks and commands.
Just lemme remind you we will all someday be accountable to him who lives and dies.
-
Hey UGP,i think i know your opinion of the Rittenhouse verdict,but not quite 100% sure.
Mind if i ask you what you thought?
To be 100% honest - I did not follow the trial at all and only saw small bits of media coverage of the incident (in which I believe the media most likely presented it as a slanted piece to support their anti gun liberal agenda). Given those two points, I truly do not have an opinion on the verdict, except to say that I have to trust that the jury did
what they were supposed to do. I do not know enough about the evidence or testimony to say for sure one way or the other.
There are going to be many lawsuits because of how the media portrayed this young man.
Rittenhouse will be looking over his shoulder forever.
I dont support someone not agreeing with verdict and killing him,as i said only God has the final say.But he will reap what he sowed.Tuff lesson to learn at such a young age.
-
Hey UGP,i think i know your opinion of the Rittenhouse verdict,but not quite 100% sure.
Mind if i ask you what you thought?
To be 100% honest - I did not follow the trial at all and only saw small bits of media coverage of the incident (in which I believe the media most likely presented it as a slanted piece to support their anti gun liberal agenda). Given those two points, I truly do not have an opinion on the verdict, except to say that I have to trust that the jury did
what they were supposed to do. I do not know enough about the evidence or testimony to say for sure one way or the other.
There are going to be many lawsuits because of how the media portrayed this young man.
Rittenhouse will be looking over his shoulder forever.
I dont support someone not agreeing with verdict and killing him,as i said only God has the final say.But he will reap what he sowed.Tuff lesson to learn at such a young age.
tot tot
-
I don’t understand how killing someone holding an empty plastic bag could be considered self defense.
-
I don’t understand how killing someone holding an empty plastic bag could be considered self defense.
The bag was not empty, just saying