FC Community

Discussion Boards => Suggestions => Topic started by: Rahab1020 on May 07, 2019, 12:53:45 am

Title: Sex
Post by: Rahab1020 on May 07, 2019, 12:53:45 am
*bleep* me



Title: Re: Sex
Post by: JediJohnnie on May 10, 2019, 12:11:33 pm
Um, no thanks?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: linderlizzie on May 10, 2019, 12:13:44 pm
Um, no thanks?

Good reply. Made me laugh. I really didn't know how to respond to that post.

I just supposed they were angry already, like most newbies tend to be.


:fish:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: oldbuddy on May 11, 2019, 02:45:23 pm
You need to look up tapping or EFT on YouTube
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Girlsub8 on May 21, 2019, 10:18:42 am
Why would you want to talk about sex on here . so everyone could see it .. No Way !!! :bad:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: oldbuddy on May 21, 2019, 03:32:26 pm
Why would you want to talk about sex on here . so everyone could see it .. No Way !!! :bad:
I talk about it almost every day when I take the surveys, since they almost always ask what sex I am.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Timothy12345 on May 21, 2019, 11:08:57 pm
*bleep* me
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Timothy12345 on May 21, 2019, 11:09:22 pm
Um, no thanks?
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: nannycoe1 on May 22, 2019, 06:56:09 am
People are so immature
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: vg7405 on May 28, 2019, 02:27:48 am
Um, OK. That was extremely weird...and pointless. Really?!
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Mizzkizz7 on May 30, 2019, 05:55:50 pm
I don't understand
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: berthabutt on June 11, 2019, 12:39:58 am
I suggest you go troll *bleep* hub chat.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: freedomjarhead2512 on June 13, 2019, 09:29:24 pm
For one, I think this belongs in the Off Topic forum.  That's just me.  But, to me sounds like someone is looking for one of their 30 postings the wrong way.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: myfreebees316 on June 30, 2019, 03:02:31 pm
For one, I think this belongs in the Off Topic forum.  That's just me.  But, to me sounds like someone is looking for one of their 30 postings the wrong way.

This so does belong in the off topic section
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: mapiklfish on July 11, 2019, 06:55:32 pm
Um, no thanks?

I agree.  Good reply. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: mapiklfish on July 11, 2019, 06:56:06 pm
Why would you want to talk about sex on here . so everyone could see it .. No Way !!! :bad:
I talk about it almost every day when I take the surveys, since they almost always ask what sex I am.

HAHA  Good one!   ;D
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: arobinson1331 on September 08, 2019, 09:48:30 pm
this is a very interesting topic to bring up with a bunch of strangers on the internet. Stay safe out there kids! (I know you are all adults) consent is keyyyyy
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: mardukblood2009 on September 09, 2019, 12:20:37 am
I think we should talk about everything on here instead the same old boring subjects.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: bshee58 on September 13, 2019, 09:10:05 am
RaHab, you seriously need REhab, or something that will put you in check. FC, please take that off the topic list.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Drutts0643 on September 14, 2019, 02:17:57 pm
*bleep* me
This fool makes 1 post 4 months ago!
Hey guys,just a reminder,the North won the Civil War!!
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: syautzy on September 19, 2019, 04:35:02 am
well thats one way to get to your 30 post!!
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Timothy12345 on December 21, 2019, 03:18:48 am
*bleep* me
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: heypeg on February 23, 2020, 04:17:43 pm
Very weird.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Harmabe on February 25, 2020, 08:55:56 pm
Where at baby
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: hicham1976 on February 29, 2020, 09:00:59 pm
we only here to make money through internet  :star :confused1:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Emmachapman on July 30, 2020, 02:56:02 pm
I think it is not the topic which will fit in this forum, but it is funny. Especially when you just wrote two words and now this thread is read more than many other threads. To be honest, it could be an interesting topic if you asked something, I think that people here have a good experience, because the majority is over 30, I would like to listen to interesting stories.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: dsawan on July 31, 2020, 04:34:20 pm
shd be in off-topic; we're simply money grubbers.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: MichaelCol on September 07, 2020, 04:45:16 am
Dafaq am I reading right now? ??? The OP actually was asking for the stuff I'm thinking about? Weird way to enter forum about money. I think that the OP needs a doctor. It seems like the OP is a male. Maybe he got ED and it made him insane? Buddy, if so, I have a message for you. You can just go to the freaking urologist, and he will help you. Or, I dunno, use some thematic community. Like this andrologyforum.com (https://www.andrologyforum.com) one, for example. Don't confuse people who went here just to learn how to earn some bucks.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Mizzkizz7 on September 14, 2020, 07:47:21 pm
Hey!Hey!!Hey ???
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: oldbuddy on September 15, 2020, 08:59:32 am
well thats one way to get to your 30 post!!
Actually it's not, only contributory posts count.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: kjstrukel on September 30, 2020, 03:16:03 am
Good grief.  I am scrambling to get my post quota for Sept. and there are some weird topics here (like this one!)!
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: king4cash on October 25, 2020, 06:32:01 pm
Guys try to keep it clean on this site....there is no need to go the sex route...
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on October 25, 2020, 07:36:57 pm
FC member wrote 1 post on this a yr and half ago.

Cant believe it still gets attn!!

What some do to get their 30 posts.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: NRAJOE2 on December 20, 2020, 10:12:03 am
*bleep* me

FC bleeped me real good.... :bad: :bad: :bad:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: linderlizzie on December 20, 2020, 04:47:25 pm
*bleep* me

FC bleeped me real good.... :bad: :bad: :bad:

If that's the case, NRAJOE2, then why did you return? Are you a glutton for punishment, or do you think FC will attempt to rectify their mistake and UNBLEEP you?

I liked you lots better before. You sound awfully hateful to everything now. Cheer up!  :party:
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: countrygirl12 on December 21, 2020, 04:09:30 am
*bleep* me

FC bleeped me real good.... :bad: :bad: :bad:

If that's the case, NRAJOE2, then why did you return? Are you a glutton for punishment, or do you think FC will attempt to rectify their mistake and UNBLEEP you?

I liked you lots better before. You sound awfully hateful to everything now. Cheer up!  :party:


I am not sure NRAJOE is the original one. If I were cheated out of $111 I would not come back on here and try it again unless I were paid. If you remember there were a couple who were trying to figure out how much he should have been owed.  They spent days worrying about it.  Here is my thought, People tend to use the same name across several sites.  I do not but some do.  I have seen the orig NRAJOE on a couple of other sites.  HE has not been active on those sites since he went MIA on this site.

The last part of your statement .... who does it sound like? lol  Think about it.  When he resurfaced who did he start agreeing with that he did not agree with before.  smh
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: NRAJOE2 on December 21, 2020, 01:30:27 pm
Yeah...it's me...who the f do you think it is?????????????????

I'm f'ing pi ssed thats why I'm here...F FC gonna post until I get banned and cause chaos and mayhem.............YAAAAAAAAAA
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on December 21, 2020, 04:39:29 pm
Wow,3 supporters of Trump at odds with each other.Tsk tsk.

The idiot CG cant put 2 + 2 together that NRA has the same pic.If it was an imposter where would the imposter get the same pic?

It all adds up that FC screwed him.UGP thought his banner was wrong....i thought the virus nailed him.....we were both wrong.

CG probably thinks you are Hitch NRA.....LOL!!

You have my support to rant as much as you want RE FC.They screwed Hitch too in another way.

I also warned members here how CG looks to dig up dirt on everybody and remain incognito.Notice she doesnt use same screen name on other sites as she said.Notice she has an opinion on NRA on other sites too.

Real snake.

She doesnt like i have moderating duties on FC now.

The only reason i dont ban her like i did Jedi is,the forum got to be very boring with less activity cos bonus not being paid.So we need her nonsense,lies,controversy to humor us.

Can i help it that i am able to kill 2 birds with 1 stone?Bring forth truth and still entertain the FC members?

Title: Re: Sex
Post by: santa7 on January 31, 2021, 01:10:42 am
Why would you want to talk about sex on here . so everyone could see it .. No Way !!! :bad:
I talk about it almost every day when I take the surveys, since they almost always ask what sex I am.

that was a good one.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: UGetPaid on February 03, 2021, 02:19:01 pm
It all adds up that FC screwed him.UGP thought his banner was wrong....i thought the virus nailed him.....we were both wrong.


I beg to differ with you, but it's a moot point anyway.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on February 07, 2021, 12:40:19 pm
It all adds up that FC screwed him.UGP thought his banner was wrong....i thought the virus nailed him.....we were both wrong.


I beg to differ with you, but it's a moot point anyway.
You beg to differ with me?LOL!So what else is new?

I know from him not being around i thought virus got him.Im convinced what he said RE FC screwing him.At this point im not really sure what U thought and we both could give a rats butt.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: UGetPaid on February 09, 2021, 10:40:02 am
It all adds up that FC screwed him.UGP thought his banner was wrong....i thought the virus nailed him.....we were both wrong.


I beg to differ with you, but it's a moot point anyway.
You beg to differ with me?LOL!So what else is new?

I know from him not being around i thought virus got him.Im convinced what he said RE FC screwing him.At this point im not really sure what U thought and we both could give a rats butt.


If you look back at what I said, you would see that my explanation and NRAJoe's explanation are one and the same. We may have worded it a bit differently: he said that he was screwed out of earnings by FC, and I said that he probably had earnings initially credited and then later rejected/withdrawn - but that the banner failed to reflect the adjustment and only displayed the initial higher calculation. I also said that this is the exact same situation that my banner has demonstrated for several years. My explanation falls neatly in line with his explanation.


It's okay, I don't expect you to admit that I was right. But for you to say on one hand that we were both wrong and in the next breath say that you aren't really sure what I even thought to begin with (even though it is clearly explained several times over in prior posts) is just a tiny bit disingenuous and dismissive.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on February 09, 2021, 07:47:52 pm
It all adds up that FC screwed him.UGP thought his banner was wrong....i thought the virus nailed him.....we were both wrong.


I beg to differ with you, but it's a moot point anyway.
You beg to differ with me?LOL!So what else is new?

I know from him not being around i thought virus got him.Im convinced what he said RE FC screwing him.At this point im not really sure what U thought and we both could give a rats butt.


If you look back at what I said, you would see that my explanation and NRAJoe's explanation are one and the same. We may have worded it a bit differently: he said that he was screwed out of earnings by FC, and I said that he probably had earnings initially credited and then later rejected/withdrawn - but that the banner failed to reflect the adjustment and only displayed the initial higher calculation. I also said that this is the exact same situation that my banner has demonstrated for several years. My explanation falls neatly in line with his explanation.


It's okay, I don't expect you to admit that I was right. But for you to say on one hand that we were both wrong and in the next breath say that you aren't really sure what I even thought to begin with (even though it is clearly explained several times over in prior posts) is just a tiny bit disingenuous and dismissive.
The banner that displays what you received NEVER got updated.That much i remember cos i really thought he may have passed NOT to claim it.It was too much $$$ not to claim it and i know from his past posts he never woulda let it run out.....hence again i thought he passed.

Those amounts NEVER changed.I always checked.The amounts on the 2 banners NEVER were the same.

Your explanation whatever it is im not surprised i dont either care or comprehend what U say.I know how i felt and admitted what i thought.

If i misunderstood U i guess we are even cos U never understand me either.You take it personal and yet say MOOT?LOL!!

Seriously take a hike or put me on ignore.

And just remember when it comes to the  biblical truth it isnt me YOU disagree with,i reference what i post.Fine you wanna disagree with JW.org thats your decision.

You have more then convinced me you are a STOUT Republican!!It carries over to other stuff.Seems Countrygirl Syndrome as contagious as Covid is.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: UGetPaid on February 10, 2021, 04:21:48 am

If i misunderstood U i guess we are even cos U never understand me either.You take it personal and yet say MOOT?LOL!!

Seriously take a hike or put me on ignore.

And just remember when it comes to the  biblical truth it isnt me YOU disagree with,i reference what i post.Fine you wanna disagree with JW.org thats your decision.

You have more then convinced me you are a STOUT Republican!!It carries over to other stuff.Seems Countrygirl Syndrome as contagious as Covid is.




1. I truly make every effort to understand you, but often times your posts jump around making unexplained vague references to obscure points without clear A to B to C progression. That is difficult to follow and that is not on me. I don't think you are going to find any posts of mine that do not clearly and logically state my point. Now I may have had an off day here or there and not fully explained myself thoroughly, but it's not going to be a consistent pattern throughout my FC existence. You say that we have each misunderstood the other and that makes us even. A 1:1 ratio of us not being able to understand the other would make us even, but I think the ratio is a bit more lopsided than that. I expect you will disagree with that, which is absolutely your prerogative.


2. You know, I have tried the ignore option in the past for different users at different times. It works wonderfully for the spam artists and consistently/openly vulgar posters. But I've found that it is not the best option for regular community members who might say something now and then that I disagree with. You say many things that I do not 100% agree with. You say many things that are insightful and humorous (notice that I said INSIGHTFUL and not INCITEFUL). Hitting the ignore button just because I disagree with something someone says is petty and idiotic and it deprives me of any of the meaningful things that user has to say. And let me just say for the record, despite your disagreements with things that I have said, I hope that you would not put me on ignore - although it is your right to do so.


You have repeatedly made the entire forum aware of your disdain for JediJohnnie and Countrygirl. Yet you apparently never ignored them. Why is that? Please take this question in the spirit intended - I am not mocking you or typing with an accusatory tone here. I am legitimately asking the question. My point is that blocking a user just because you want to block any and all opposing viewpoints and only live in an echo chamber of your own ideas is a childish response. I am not a child and I have zero intentions of blocking you. I am not looking for a fight. I am not looking for a confrontation. I like the idea of free and open discussion. And I like to think that if I disagree with someone, I can openly state as such without the response of "You need to stop responding to me, while I am free to keep saying what I want to say." How is that a fair resolution? I have disagreed with you many times, but I don't think I have ever been disrespectful toward you.


3. Why does the bible even come into play here? What do your or my religious beliefs have to do with this particular dialog? Since you brought it up... Do I disagree with you and with JW? On many points, yes I do. Do I believe that you have the right to believe what you believe? Absolutely! Do I have the right to maintain my disagreement with your beliefs? I think so - as long as I do not infringe upon you religious freedom or physically persecute you for them.  If you want to shout to the world that my religion is wrong and you are right about God and salvation and everything else, have at it! I can't stop you. But I absolutely can defend my beliefs when I believe they are being misinterpreted or misrepresented. We've both long ago established our positions and neither of us have any delusions of changing the other's mind. That has never been my objective anyway. Unlike your sworn enemies on here, I don't believe I have ever attacked or mocked your religion. (If I have, point it out to me and I will give you my full apology). I appreciate your acknowledgement that it is my decision to disagree. Can I take that remark to the next logical step and assume that you respect my right to have that different religious belief/opinion?  (Again, I don't even know how or why this topic of religion was brought in to this particular discussion, but you apparently felt like it was necessary so those are my consistent thoughts on the subject).


4. Akin to #3, what logical, philosophical, or rational difference does it make to this discussion whether I am a Republican, Democrat, or Independent? Congratulations, you have ratted me out as a conservative. It's not a secret. What bearing does that have here? "It carries over to other stuff.Seems Countrygirl Syndrome as contagious as Covid is." What does that even mean?? We've come full circle here. I don't know whether I am being insulted, being made fun of, being jabbed in the ribs jokingly, etc. I don't know if I should feel offended, vindicated, or what in response to that last remark. I would ask you to enlighten me, but I think that might just get me into more trouble.
 :-X
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on February 10, 2021, 06:59:02 am

If i misunderstood U i guess we are even cos U never understand me either.You take it personal and yet say MOOT?LOL!!

Seriously take a hike or put me on ignore.

And just remember when it comes to the  biblical truth it isnt me YOU disagree with,i reference what i post.Fine you wanna disagree with JW.org thats your decision.

You have more then convinced me you are a STOUT Republican!!It carries over to other stuff.Seems Countrygirl Syndrome as contagious as Covid is.




1. I truly make every effort to understand you, but often times your posts jump around making unexplained vague references to obscure points without clear A to B to C progression. That is difficult to follow and that is not on me. I don't think you are going to find any posts of mine that do not clearly and logically state my point. Now I may have had an off day here or there and not fully explained myself thoroughly, but it's not going to be a consistent pattern throughout my FC existence. You say that we have each misunderstood the other and that makes us even. A 1:1 ratio of us not being able to understand the other would make us even, but I think the ratio is a bit more lopsided than that. I expect you will disagree with that, which is absolutely your prerogative.


2. You know, I have tried the ignore option in the past for different users at different times. It works wonderfully for the spam artists and consistently/openly vulgar posters. But I've found that it is not the best option for regular community members who might say something now and then that I disagree with. You say many things that I do not 100% agree with. You say many things that are insightful and humorous (notice that I said INSIGHTFUL and not INCITEFUL). Hitting the ignore button just because I disagree with something someone says is petty and idiotic and it deprives me of any of the meaningful things that user has to say. And let me just say for the record, despite your disagreements with things that I have said, I hope that you would not put me on ignore - although it is your right to do so.


You have repeatedly made the entire forum aware of your disdain for JediJohnnie and Countrygirl. Yet you apparently never ignored them. Why is that? Please take this question in the spirit intended - I am not mocking you or typing with an accusatory tone here. I am legitimately asking the question. My point is that blocking a user just because you want to block any and all opposing viewpoints and only live in an echo chamber of your own ideas is a childish response. I am not a child and I have zero intentions of blocking you. I am not looking for a fight. I am not looking for a confrontation. I like the idea of free and open discussion. And I like to think that if I disagree with someone, I can openly state as such without the response of "You need to stop responding to me, while I am free to keep saying what I want to say." How is that a fair resolution? I have disagreed with you many times, but I don't think I have ever been disrespectful toward you.


3. Why does the bible even come into play here? What do your or my religious beliefs have to do with this particular dialog? Since you brought it up... Do I disagree with you and with JW? On many points, yes I do. Do I believe that you have the right to believe what you believe? Absolutely! Do I have the right to maintain my disagreement with your beliefs? I think so - as long as I do not infringe upon you religious freedom or physically persecute you for them.  If you want to shout to the world that my religion is wrong and you are right about God and salvation and everything else, have at it! I can't stop you. But I absolutely can defend my beliefs when I believe they are being misinterpreted or misrepresented. We've both long ago established our positions and neither of us have any delusions of changing the other's mind. That has never been my objective anyway. Unlike your sworn enemies on here, I don't believe I have ever attacked or mocked your religion. (If I have, point it out to me and I will give you my full apology). I appreciate your acknowledgement that it is my decision to disagree. Can I take that remark to the next logical step and assume that you respect my right to have that different religious belief/opinion?  (Again, I don't even know how or why this topic of religion was brought in to this particular discussion, but you apparently felt like it was necessary so those are my consistent thoughts on the subject).


4. Akin to #3, what logical, philosophical, or rational difference does it make to this discussion whether I am a Republican, Democrat, or Independent? Congratulations, you have ratted me out as a conservative. It's not a secret. What bearing does that have here? "It carries over to other stuff.Seems Countrygirl Syndrome as contagious as Covid is." What does that even mean?? We've come full circle here. I don't know whether I am being insulted, being made fun of, being jabbed in the ribs jokingly, etc. I don't know if I should feel offended, vindicated, or what in response to that last remark. I would ask you to enlighten me, but I think that might just get me into more trouble.
 :-X

I will take your long post in pieces.

I guess its not proof enuff for you Hitch,Drutts and myself have over 700 TYs in around 6000 posts.That proves many have understood us.Sorry if you havent.I know we arent all perfect but our effort is always there.

You know how i felt RE Hitch being banned for supporting JW.org.CG and JJ had much to do behind th scenes with that.We have been more then blessed exposing them in the forum with other members and havent missed a beat.We have brought up JJ time to time when the need for it has come up,but he left 7 months ago and you can count the posts on 1 hand where we have spoken of him.He banned himself cos the child didnt get his way in the candy store.Yes i know some of it had to do with FC earnings hasnt been as good but im convinced he cried over spilt milk.

CG chooses to still be here and we will forever set her azz straight on what she is out of truth and yes we consider ourselves clever and entertaining too.

I always told i had no problem with you if i spoke the truth RE christendom.I compared it with having friends that are gay but i dont agree with their lifestyle.

I despise liars and injustice.You got that from CG and JJ.

IMO your political and nationalistic views are a bit too much from someone who claims they are a xtian.Ive put up proof from the bible what God and Jesus think of this world.

If you remember within the last few months i had 2 FC members scold me for harping so much on CG and 1 said i embarrassed the organization.Well she should have gone back over all 6000 posts and copy and paste ALL the times we have supported it.We feel good what we have said RE Gods organization. All the TYs back that up too.

Back to the NRA thing....I tried to explain that in view to the 2 banners on his page.To me it looked like the virus got him.I admitted what i thought.My experience with FC was when U got paid they updated the banner right away.In his case they didnt and thats why i thought he died.

When he made 2nd acct and explained it i believed him cos he put same pic up.If U remember CG <Miss paranoid>questioned it.What else is new with her?Her state is Garden of Eden RE the virus etc.She is so full of it.

Ill be the first we all arent perfect,but i can say our posts are based on truth,humor,etc.We also are very sensitive to injustice and we display when we are but try to do so in a manner that is acceptable.


I also think JW.org does a GREAT job explaining the bible.As you know i defend it strongly when others mock it.

Not sure i covered everything.Thanx for listening.

If U cant figure out from this post what i mean what CG syndrome is,U have NO sense of humor and blind to the truth RE her.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: UGetPaid on February 11, 2021, 04:13:19 am

I guess its not proof enuff for you Hitch,Drutts and myself have over 700 TYs in around 6000 posts.That proves many have understood us.Sorry if you havent.I know we arent all perfect but our effort is always there.


It's not about "proof", although I'm not in complete agreement that just because someone thanked you is 'proof' that they understood. It is evidence that other people like what the three of you have said, but the sheer number of thank you's doesn't explain away my effort to try to understand, but inability to follow your logic at times.

Also, not that it matters, but Drutts and Hitch were the exact same person. There is evidence of that in the forum. There is no hard proof that YOU are the same person, but you have many similarities in your personality and writing style to theirs. Regardless of that - I am trying to understand what difference it makes how many thank you's the three of you have collectively received to any discussion about my difficulty in understanding you - singularly - the user named Donnamarg323. 



You know how i felt RE Hitch being banned for supporting JW.org.CG and JJ had much to do behind th scenes with that.We have been more then blessed exposing them in the forum with other members and havent missed a beat.We have brought up JJ time to time when the need for it has come up,but he left 7 months ago and you can count the posts on 1 hand where we have spoken of him.He banned himself cos the child didnt get his way in the candy store.Yes i know some of it had to do with FC earnings hasnt been as good but im convinced he cried over spilt milk.

CG chooses to still be here and we will forever set her azz straight on what she is out of truth and yes we consider ourselves clever and entertaining too.

I always told i had no problem with you if i spoke the truth RE christendom.I compared it with having friends that are gay but i dont agree with their lifestyle.

I despise liars and injustice.You got that from CG and JJ.

Like I said, your issues with JJ and CG are well documented. And I didn't mean to open up old cans of worms there. I merely brought it up in response to your remark to me (I am paraphrasing here) to "just go away and ignore me".

I won't rehash what I said before about my feelings on using the ignore feature - but just that I raised JJ and CG in order to prove my point about the futility of ignoring.


IMO your political and nationalistic views are a bit too much from someone who claims they are a xtian.Ive put up proof from the bible what God and Jesus think of this world.


That is your opinion and that is fine, but I am going to say that I do not believe my social, economic, or political beliefs are in any way in conflict with my Christian beliefs. I know some might disagree. Your religion and my religion differ a great deal on some of those matters. That doesn't make either of us a bad person - so I hope you aren't getting that vibe from me. Your decision to not vote is based entirely (or predominantly) on the JW teaching. My decision TO vote is based largely upon my Catholic Church's teaching. You can tell me that I am wrong, but according to my faith - I have a duty to vote. Your JW biblical proof is an interpretation of the scriptures, but it is not the decisive interpretation of the scriptures to the exclusion of any other possible interpretations. Again, I don't expect you to concede that point. And I don't mean to insult you with this remark, but I do not believe that JW always interprets everything correctly - especially when taking one verse here or there as determinative of an entire debate. That doesn't mean that I do not believe in the bible just because I see some things differently than you do. And that is the impression I've gotten from you or Drutts or Hitch many times over - UGetPaid doesn't believe in what WE say the bible says - so he doesn't believe in the authority of the bible. That is not the case.

When it comes to public policy and political issues, there are some points where my religion trumps the Republican platform, but generally speaking - I feel that the Republican party is more in line than the Democrat party in keeping with my religious beliefs. It is not a neat little box where I agree with everything Donald Trump does or everything that the Republican ticket espouses. But as I have justified many times before in these forums the hypocrisy and double standards are so lopsided in favor of the Bidens, Obamas, and other D's that it gets quite infuriating.

Ill be the first we all arent perfect,but i can say our posts are based on truth,humor,etc.We also are very sensitive to injustice and we display when we are but try to do so in a manner that is acceptable.


I also think JW.org does a GREAT job explaining the bible.As you know i defend it strongly when others mock it.

Not sure i covered everything.Thanx for listening.

Thank you for explaining. You know, we often disagree and get into debate mode, but we also often end up back in this position of guarded understanding.


Look. I will be the first to admit. You have a strong faith and I've said before and will say again that I respect that, even when I don't agree 100% with it. I am again going to tell you that *I* have a strong faith as well.

I will concede another point. I am not well versed enough to debate every specific scripture issue, which is why I usually do not engage in that exercise here. Your JW.org site has specific references to different specific questions. I do not have the personal grasp at my fingertips of all Catholic resources to make all of the fine tuned counterpoints. That doesn't automatically make me wrong.

I do attend a weekly bible study with other men of my local Catholic community where we discuss the scriptures for the upcoming Sunday Mass. Many viewpoints are discussed and most of the time I am more of a listener than a contributor. I also listen to several Catholic apologists on the radio on a regular basis who have a much better grasp of the scriptures and the Catholic tradition than I do. Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin do a fabulous job discussing the truth about the Catholic Church and the many lies and misconceptions about the Catholic Church that are out there. I am not programmed to speak with the same eloquence and authority as these men have been blessed to do. If you have the spare time, I would invite you to visit catholic.com and seek out the Catholic Answers podcast for a better understanding of what I believe.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on February 11, 2021, 04:29:11 pm

I guess its not proof enuff for you Hitch,Drutts and myself have over 700 TYs in around 6000 posts.That proves many have understood us.Sorry if you havent.I know we arent all perfect but our effort is always there.


It's not about "proof", although I'm not in complete agreement that just because someone thanked you is 'proof' that they understood. It is evidence that other people like what the three of you have said, but the sheer number of thank you's doesn't explain away my effort to try to understand, but inability to follow your logic at times.

Also, not that it matters, but Drutts and Hitch were the exact same person. There is evidence of that in the forum. There is no hard proof that YOU are the same person, but you have many similarities in your personality and writing style to theirs. Regardless of that - I am trying to understand what difference it makes how many thank you's the three of you have collectively received to any discussion about my difficulty in understanding you - singularly - the user named Donnamarg323. 



You know how i felt RE Hitch being banned for supporting JW.org.CG and JJ had much to do behind th scenes with that.We have been more then blessed exposing them in the forum with other members and havent missed a beat.We have brought up JJ time to time when the need for it has come up,but he left 7 months ago and you can count the posts on 1 hand where we have spoken of him.He banned himself cos the child didnt get his way in the candy store.Yes i know some of it had to do with FC earnings hasnt been as good but im convinced he cried over spilt milk.

CG chooses to still be here and we will forever set her azz straight on what she is out of truth and yes we consider ourselves clever and entertaining too.

I always told i had no problem with you if i spoke the truth RE christendom.I compared it with having friends that are gay but i dont agree with their lifestyle.

I despise liars and injustice.You got that from CG and JJ.

Like I said, your issues with JJ and CG are well documented. And I didn't mean to open up old cans of worms there. I merely brought it up in response to your remark to me (I am paraphrasing here) to "just go away and ignore me".

I won't rehash what I said before about my feelings on using the ignore feature - but just that I raised JJ and CG in order to prove my point about the futility of ignoring.


IMO your political and nationalistic views are a bit too much from someone who claims they are a xtian.Ive put up proof from the bible what God and Jesus think of this world.


That is your opinion and that is fine, but I am going to say that I do not believe my social, economic, or political beliefs are in any way in conflict with my Christian beliefs. I know some might disagree. Your religion and my religion differ a great deal on some of those matters. That doesn't make either of us a bad person - so I hope you aren't getting that vibe from me. Your decision to not vote is based entirely (or predominantly) on the JW teaching. My decision TO vote is based largely upon my Catholic Church's teaching. You can tell me that I am wrong, but according to my faith - I have a duty to vote. Your JW biblical proof is an interpretation of the scriptures, but it is not the decisive interpretation of the scriptures to the exclusion of any other possible interpretations. Again, I don't expect you to concede that point. And I don't mean to insult you with this remark, but I do not believe that JW always interprets everything correctly - especially when taking one verse here or there as determinative of an entire debate. That doesn't mean that I do not believe in the bible just because I see some things differently than you do. And that is the impression I've gotten from you or Drutts or Hitch many times over - UGetPaid doesn't believe in what WE say the bible says - so he doesn't believe in the authority of the bible. That is not the case.

When it comes to public policy and political issues, there are some points where my religion trumps the Republican platform, but generally speaking - I feel that the Republican party is more in line than the Democrat party in keeping with my religious beliefs. It is not a neat little box where I agree with everything Donald Trump does or everything that the Republican ticket espouses. But as I have justified many times before in these forums the hypocrisy and double standards are so lopsided in favor of the Bidens, Obamas, and other D's that it gets quite infuriating.

Ill be the first we all arent perfect,but i can say our posts are based on truth,humor,etc.We also are very sensitive to injustice and we display when we are but try to do so in a manner that is acceptable.


I also think JW.org does a GREAT job explaining the bible.As you know i defend it strongly when others mock it.

Not sure i covered everything.Thanx for listening.

Thank you for explaining. You know, we often disagree and get into debate mode, but we also often end up back in this position of guarded understanding.


Look. I will be the first to admit. You have a strong faith and I've said before and will say again that I respect that, even when I don't agree 100% with it. I am again going to tell you that *I* have a strong faith as well.

I will concede another point. I am not well versed enough to debate every specific scripture issue, which is why I usually do not engage in that exercise here. Your JW.org site has specific references to different specific questions. I do not have the personal grasp at my fingertips of all Catholic resources to make all of the fine tuned counterpoints. That doesn't automatically make me wrong.

I do attend a weekly bible study with other men of my local Catholic community where we discuss the scriptures for the upcoming Sunday Mass. Many viewpoints are discussed and most of the time I am more of a listener than a contributor. I also listen to several Catholic apologists on the radio on a regular basis who have a much better grasp of the scriptures and the Catholic tradition than I do. Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin do a fabulous job discussing the truth about the Catholic Church and the many lies and misconceptions about the Catholic Church that are out there. I am not programmed to speak with the same eloquence and authority as these men have been blessed to do. If you have the spare time, I would invite you to visit catholic.com and seek out the Catholic Answers podcast for a better understanding of what I believe.
UGP,in your case being the Catholic religeon supports the trinity,just think of Hitch,Drutts and myself the same way.

I always told JJ rather then debate me RE the bible he was comp literate enuff to go on JW.org and see how they explained the bible.

He wanted to debate.That shows it was more important for him to be right or disagree with something he didnt support.Thats fine.He took it to another level and said Hitch ran roughshod over the forum and JJ persecuted the JWs with his tongue.

CG the same way.....but more sneaky and used internet to try to find out more of the person.All she had to do was ask me for my phone #.....We have nothing to hide....she does.

I honestly wouldnt give her my # anyway.Liars cause trouble and i dont trust her.But we had no prob saying we live in NY.Shes the paranoid one and one usually feels that way cos she knows deep down inside she *isses many off and afraid someday one might retaliate........hence shes incognito and hides behind keyboard but yet thinks shes going to heaven....LOL!!!!

God says in the bible more then once that earth will be inhabited forever and the righteous will inherit it.

It also says that 144000 of mankind will rule from heaven with Jesus after God sends the Satanic system to oblivion.

Yet so many think they die and go to a heaven or hell.The bible supports NONE of that like it doesnt support Xmas as another example.

I also invite you to JW.org knowing you are comp literate to bible truths and answers to questions.

Thank you.

Title: Re: Sex
Post by: UGetPaid on February 11, 2021, 07:00:33 pm
The bible supports NONE of that like it doesnt support Xmas as another example.
An interesting discussion on that point that I just recently came across - a podcast by Jimmy Akin who I referred to above. He discussed that topic in an episode titled: When was Jesus born?


https://sqpn.com/2018/12/mys019-when-was-jesus-born/


Although he is a Catholic who celebrates the Christmas holiday on December 25, he is not one of those people who insists that the day is accurate and undisputed and he presents several arguments to suggest otherwise. He also discusses the arguments that those who do insist on the date, and tends to show the faulty logic in those. He is very respectful to both sides of the issue. In the end, he concludes that we do not know the specific date, but we can be much more certain on the specific year.
Title: Re: Sex
Post by: Donnamarg323 on February 11, 2021, 07:16:44 pm
The bible supports NONE of that like it doesnt support Xmas as another example.
An interesting discussion on that point that I just recently came across - a podcast by Jimmy Akin who I referred to above. He discussed that topic in an episode titled: When was Jesus born?


https://sqpn.com/2018/12/mys019-when-was-jesus-born/


Although he is a Catholic who celebrates the Christmas holiday on December 25, he is not one of those people who insists that the day is accurate and undisputed and he presents several arguments to suggest otherwise. He also discusses the arguments that those who do insist on the date, and tends to show the faulty logic in those. He is very respectful to both sides of the issue. In the end, he concludes that we do not know the specific date, but we can be much more certain on the specific year.
Regardless of Jesus BD,Jesus didnt command it be celebrated.Yes we can rejoice when the angels shouted out to the shepards he was born,but remember if he didnt die his birth would mean nothing cos his life by Gods rules was the ransom.Eye for an eye.Perfect life for perfect one Adam doomed mankind with.Good scripture on that......

1st Corinth 15:45  45 So it is written: “The first man Adam became a living person.”+ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit

Also if God thought it was important for us to know Jesus BD wouldnt he have told us in bible the same way we know it was Nisan 14 <Jewish calendar>that Jesus was executed?

Some things we dont know or might have a later fulfillment.

2 BDs are mentioned in bible and both ended up as executions.The more famous being John the Baptist getting head cut off.