daily Bible verse

[falcon9]

And that childishness is ex

If you're going to disregard context to make 'flame' replies, requoting the actual context becomes unnecessary.

[tuscarorarain]

"12 Sow to yourselves in righteousness, reap in mercy; break up your fallow ground: for it is time to seek the LORD, till he come and rain righteousness upon you."
Hosea 10:12 KJV Bible online
 

[falcon9]

"If we go back to the beginning we shall find that ignorance and fear created the g-ds; that fancy, enthusiasm, or deceit adorned or disfigured them; that weakness worships them; that credulity preserves them, and that custom, respect and tyranny support them in order to make the blindness of men serve its own interests."
-- Baron d'Holbach, The System of Nature

[jcribb16]

The only ones I've seen you extend kindness to, in here, are anyone other than those who have acknowledged God in their lives.

False.   "Sherylshadow" for instance is but one example, (others exist both on and off these forums).

All I can say about that certain poster is that we, at one time, were Christian supporters and encouragers, and got along great.

Hold on, let's not gloss over this too quickly ... I gave an example of extending "kindness" to a self-professed xtian and this invalidates your contention.  Now, moving on to your fickle support for xtians, depending upon whether they agree with you or not:

When she started jumping me for standing up to you, that showed me that things were far from what they used to be.  I will not back down from you to ride the fence with someone else just to be on your so-called good side.  So, if she wants to be your pal, that's all and well for her.

How incredibly insulting of her for you to insinuate that's what she was doing.  If that poster chooses to reply, she can - I won't presume to speak for her as you've just done in a most despicable manner.
 

... when harassed by the likes of your irrational hate of Christians ...

Opposing initially-posted xtian propaganda isn't hassassing; it's a dissenting reponse.  Your false characterizations continue to be dishonest and biased.

I'm not in this forum for your benefit and enjoyment.

Just as I'm not on these forums to have dissenting viewpoints suppressed by some theocratic fundies.
 

I am not in here to try and make posters look delusional, irrational, and crazy, for something they differ in views with my own about.  

No, you're here to promote such self-delusional religious superstitions and irrational blind faith.  I'm here to oppose such.

I did not name her by name - you did; you called her by name.  She's already chewed me out and not been "sister" Christianly towards me, when I've stood up to you.  That's the truth and she and I both know it - because up until a few days prior to that happening - we were welcoming each other back to the forum, since we both had been in less often.  If she wants to respond, yes you are absolutely right - she will.  Last I know, she had me on ignore.  Her choice.
 
How dare you say I said despicable things when you say them all of the time towards us who are Christians?  Yet, you are sided with by a couple of "Christians" - where is the commitment and loyalty to other Christians, when backing the kinds of things you say?  I refuse to be a "lukewarm" Christian just to be on your "good side" when you are so hateful.

I respect your choice to dis-believe - you refuse the same tolerance, and persist in being ugly about it.  You do that to other Christians constantly, and I will not stand by and just watch it happen - I will stand up for them, just as they stand up for me.  Jesus said, "Be ye angry, and sin not."  I am not sinning by angrily standing up for Christ and for my Christian friends.  

[falcon9]

If she wants to respond, yes you are absolutely right - she will.
 
How dare you say I said despicable things ...

I "dare" because it's the truth, one has only to scroll down one post to read what you posted or, I can requote your words:
Quote from: jcribb16 on Today at 14:42:09 -

"When she started jumping me for standing up to you, that showed me that things were far from what they used to be.  I will not back down from you to ride the fence with someone else just to be on your so-called good side.  So, if she wants to be your pal, that's all and well for her."

 Yet, you are sided with by a couple of "Christians" - where is the commitment and loyalty ... to be a "lukewarm" Christian just to be on your "good side"

So, if they agree with anything a non-xtian posts, they're "lukewarm" xtians and if they agree with fundie xtians, they're 'circling the wagans against the pagan injuns'?  You're a sanctimonious hypocrite.

I respect your choice to dis-believe - 

No, you don't and your ranting irrational posts to the contrary disprove your self-righteous and false contention.

[remediagirl]

If she wants to respond, yes you are absolutely right - she will.
 
How dare you say I said despicable things ...

I "dare" because it's the truth, one has only to scroll down one post to read what you posted or, I can requote your words:
Quote from: jcribb16 on Today at 14:42:09 -

"When she started jumping me for standing up to you, that showed me that things were far from what they used to be.  I will not back down from you to ride the fence with someone else just to be on your so-called good side.  So, if she wants to be your pal, that's all and well for her."

 Yet, you are sided with by a couple of "Christians" - where is the commitment and loyalty ... to be a "lukewarm" Christian just to be on your "good side"

So, if they agree with anything a non-xtian posts, they're "lukewarm" xtians and if they agree with fundie xtians, they're 'circling the wagans against the pagan injuns'?  You're a sanctimonious hypocrite.

I respect your choice to dis-believe - 

No, you don't and your ranting irrational posts to the contrary disprove your self-righteous and false contention.

In a different thread I just seen that he posted "well said" to someone that said to "Have faith in yourself and draw strength, from whatever you need, to carry on in a positive way."
In Falcon9's opinion...isn't faith illogical? Maybe he is getting confused???

[falcon9]

In a different thread I just seen that he posted "well said" to someone that said to "Have faith in yourself and draw strength, from whatever you need, to carry on in a positive way."

I suppose I could have snipped the part I wasn't referring to, (the "... draw strength, from whatever ..." was not was the comment was in reference to), since I concurred with most of "zcote's" post.

In Falcon9's opinion...isn't faith illogical? Maybe he is getting confused???

There's no doubt that the reply confused you because you focussed on the "faith in whatever" part while I did not.  Blind faith remains illogical and that's not the portion I remarked was well-said.  Though your confusion is not my concern, I do not concur with the vague "from whatever" remark the OP made.

[JediJohnnie]

John 16:33 (Jesus said) “I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.”

 

[falcon9]

John 16:33 (Jesus said)

There's no evidence of that.

“He that is slow to believe anything and everything is of great understanding, for belief in one false principle is the beginning of all unwisdom.”
-- anonymous

[jcribb16]

If she wants to respond, yes you are absolutely right - she will.
 
How dare you say I said despicable things ...

I "dare" because it's the truth, one has only to scroll down one post to read what you posted or, I can requote your words:
Quote from: jcribb16 on Today at 14:42:09 -

"When she started jumping me for standing up to you, that showed me that things were far from what they used to be.  I will not back down from you to ride the fence with someone else just to be on your so-called good side.  So, if she wants to be your pal, that's all and well for her."

 Yet, you are sided with by a couple of "Christians" - where is the commitment and loyalty ... to be a "lukewarm" Christian just to be on your "good side"

Quote by falcon9:
****So, if they agree with anything a non-xtian posts, they're "lukewarm" xtians and if they agree with fundie xtians, they're 'circling the wagans against the pagan injuns'?  You're a sanctimonious hypocrite.

I respect your choice to dis-believe - 

No, you don't and your ranting irrational posts to the contrary disprove your self-righteous and false contention.

****Falcon9 - do NOT put words in my mouth - that was not the correct context of what I was meaning with those words.  Mind your own wordy business and stop making my words say something they are not, just to make me look ugly.  You've no room to talk.

[falcon9]

****Falcon9 - do NOT put words in my mouth - that was not the correct context of what I was meaning with those words.  Mind your own wordy business and stop making my words say something they are not, just to make me look ugly. 

The context and your own words were quoted, (the conclusion about "wagons" was drawn from the context of your tendency to 'rush to the defense' of defenseless xtians, thus making them look too weak to respond themselves).

[jcribb16]

****Falcon9 - do NOT put words in my mouth - that was not the correct context of what I was meaning with those words.  Mind your own wordy business and stop making my words say something they are not, just to make me look ugly. 

The context and your own words were quoted, (the conclusion about "wagons" was drawn from the context of your tendency to 'rush to the defense' of defenseless xtians, thus making them look too weak to respond themselves).

You are in error, sir - knock it off.

[falcon9]

You are in error, sir - knock it off.

It's archived and not in error.  It's your choice to keep giving pointless 'commands' which will not be obeyed, fundie.

[jcribb16]

You are in error, sir - knock it off.

It's archived and not in error.  It's your choice to keep giving pointless 'commands' which will not be obeyed, fundie.

I'm speaking of you typing what you "think" my context is, when it's not.  You are in error for speaking for me - knock it off.

[falcon9]

I'm speaking of you typing what you "think" my context is, when it's not.  You are in error for speaking for me - knock it off.

You first, fundie, (since you have a penchant for doing so by 'misinterpreting' my posts through your skewed religious blinders).