So, since we will be paying for everybody else's health care either way, AND cost will still always rise, what is the whole point of Obamacare? It obviously is not the "reform" that a lot of people think it is.
Maybe you are Ok with giving up even more freedom, since we've already lost so much, but I'm NOT! That is exactly the way all the tyrants of the past, such as Stalin and Hitler, got into power.
I agree that Social security should be privatized. But unfortunately, that'll probably never happen, because it is an unsustainable program, since they pay out more than they take in.
You clearly just quoted what I wrote but it's not possible that you actually read it and comprehended it because you wouldn't be asking these questions that were already addressed. You also clearly didn't understand what I was saying about freedom either. Actually read the full back and forth between me and hawkeye3210 then get back to me. Thanks. 
Yes, I did read it all, and my question is relevant...
Not possible. If you did, you wouldn't have asked the question you asked because it was addressed in the second paragraph I wrote which you quoted. You may have looked at it, and you certainly quoted it, but it's not possible that you actually read it.
By the way, if I choose not to buy "approved" health insurance (or can't afford it), and so have to pay the fines or "extra taxes", it still doesn't give me health insurance. I'll still have to pay any healthcare bills myself, or dump the costs on the system. So this mandate still desn't provide health insurance for many of the people who are currently uninsured, and doesn't solve the cost problems.
If you
choose not to buy insurance, how is that a failure of Obamacare to provide healthcare for many? If you're given the option but you chose not to purchase insurance, how is that anyone's fault/problem but your own? If you can't afford it, that's what medicaid is for.
In fact, Obama never really intended his health care bill to provide insurance for all (or even most) Americans. He knows that most of the people who don't have it now can't afford it, because it is not provided by their employers (such as farmers and small businesses). So he is counting on the penalties as a source of revenue for his oversized government. That is a big reason why the individual mandate is so important to him (the other reason, of course, being control).
He tried to expand medicaid for this reason but hey, if conspiracies work for you...

They're useless to me though.
Conspiracy Theories: When the nuances of reality are too hard to understand, just make some s.hit up
Actually this was an underhanded way for him to go against another one of his campaign promises - not to raise taxes on the middle class.
Yes, that's what
he wanted to do 'cause that'll surely get him votes

. He actually knew it would be interpreted as a tax because it was a plan hatched when Justice Roberts swore him in. He picked Roberts 'cause he knew no one would suspect him. Brilliant plan!

The Democrats are always accusing the Republicans of cutting taxes for the rich and putting the burden on the middle class and the "poor." But who will be paying the fines (which the Supreme Court has pointed out, is really a TAX)? Certainly not the rich, who can afford premium insurance. It'll will be the middle class, people with small businesses, young people just starting out, families who make too much to qualify for medicaid, but not enough to afford to buy their own health insurance if it's not provided for by their employers. In other words, the people who already pay most of the taxes, the ones who actually work for a living and try to support themselves without handouts. So forget about Bush's tax cuts, and start worrying about Obama's tax increases, because that's what really affects ordinary Americans!
It's not an added tax. If you have insurance, you're in compliance with the law. So you're not paying the tax
on top of having insurance. Your insurance
is the tax. Young people stay on their parents insurance until 26. He tried to expand medicaid to deal with many who currently fall through the cracks but that got shot down... kinda. States can either go along with the expansion or not. Regardless though, the new law is not the
reason some fall through the cracks which you seem to be insinuating. They've
always fallen through the cracks. Anytime you try to deal with a complicated issue, you have holes you just can't plug. That's just one of them.