You stick to your evidence and stop telling someone "No" when it's not your decision.
It remains that no substantive evidence to support specious religious attributions is extant. The lack of such evidence isn't a "decision", it's factual. The religious attributions were made without supporting evidence and are therefore, false attributions to supernatural causes.
False to you and to others. Not false to some - their choice to believe how they want, evidence provided or not.
That's incorrect; a lack of substantive evidence is independent of belief, (since belief has no valid bearing upon evidence or, the lack thereof - evidence eitehr exist or, it doesn't - in the instance of religious beliefs, it doesn't). It is certainly the choice of some to 'believe' despite the lack of evidence in what they're 'believing' however, that's not rational, (and yes, 'Virginia', people have to option to hold irrational beliefs).
Now how did I know you were going to say
that again, lol! I'll just say that whatever others have experienced, studied, and decided, are things we are not privy to, and have no right to tell them that they are wrong in what they perceive as truth. While it's your prerogative to share your disagreement and why, it still doesn't mean they will change their minds over something they feel strongly about, especially if there has been an event or things to happen to back their decision.
I have experienced a couple of things, and they were shivers down the spine events, and my mind will not accept that they didn't happen - they did indeed happen, and others were there to corroborate what I saw and heard, including my father, who was of similar thinking as you are, who was dumbstruck and couldn't quit shaking his head and muttering, "I'll be d***ed" over and over.