I was actually asking for the Nancy Pelosi vid, but these ones you supplied are quite humorous. Especially the comments. Thanks for sharing!
Okay, my apologies on that. I looked but didn't find the video I was referring to but I will look more as I can. Granted I took liberties in being vague about what she was talking about, but that shouldn't matter. The clip has to do with her doing an interview where she basically says that the 'jobs bill' they want to pass will not cost anything as you can pay for it with the money you are saving by not being in a war in Iraq. Regardless of where anyone stands on issues, such logic as that has to give them pause and generate a puzzled look on many faces.
A bit wordy, but well said. Though these amounts that you deem 'meager' are still massive amounts of money-- sometimes 5-6-7 digit numbers per day going into the investors personal pocket. And when someone is using these loopholes and making this much money while under scrutiny and skepticism-- but is also trying to kindle a relationship with the rest of the countrry and become president, he seems to have automaticially alienated himself from the average joe.
I am often too wordy and tend to rattle on at times. If I took the time to compose what I wanted to say and then posted I could correct it some but that would be tedious and could easily feel like work and would decrease my interest in replying.
I meant the 15% tax rate was considered meager, not the amounts taxed. Remember he is more businessman first, than politician and I would imagine he doesn't look too closely at his taxes. Obama, Reid, Pelosi they all do the same things with their taxes. I cannot understand what the big deal is with this, as it is entirely legal and absolutely appropriate and responsible behavior for someone to do. I would be concerned if a person didn't know how to manage their finances and routinely wasted their money all the time -- but I am not considered with someone covering all the bases.
Very true. I'm definitely for ending a complex tax system. I'll quote an article I bookmarked earlier this morning-
In the end, Romney's return underscores how far we've gone from the simple tax system the nation started with in the 1900s and imposed a flat rate on anyone earning over a set amount. A tax code that produces a 203-page return is too complex to administer; too complex to comply with; and so complex that it creates inadvertent inequities that encourage gaming the system in ways that are detrimental to our society and national character. It's time to do away with the 72,536-page U.S. tax code and write our tax law on a single sheet of paper.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505144_162-57365225/lessons-from-mitt-romneys-203-page-tax-return/#comments
And the entirety of the massive tax system all stems from over-regulation. I wanted to ask, what was the reason for mentioning Romney in that quote? I am curious if it was simply due to it being a recent topic or was it in some way meant to suggest him in a bad light. I know it was a quote and not something you said so I mean in regards to the source you quoted.