And folks, there we have it.
What, you're obvious inability to comprehend the replies to your assumptions that such bible-thumping/evangelism/proselytizing should get a 'free pass' and go unchallenged simply because you deem such challenges to be "disrespectful"? What happens when others deem such proselytizings as 'disrespectful' to non-believers, (or, to the believers of other faiths)? Such one-wayism are disrepectful affronts to reason.
You seem to totally disrespect the whole idea of respect of others when it comes to anything religious.
This is the debate & discuss subforum; you already know it's an "enter at your own risk" venue and yet, keep playing that same song, (as if one can demand respect, rather than earn it).
Debate and Discuss is one thing, but to continually disrespect simple Bible verse threads/posters, is not following TOS, no matter how you cut it.
That's for an FC moderator to decide, not you or I. We can both 'interpret' the Terms of Service in this regard but, any final arbitration is FC's. You happen to be the second one today to 'threaten' me with such without a clear violation of the FC TOS, (beyond your biased interpretation of the "Golden Rule" policy).
You, for one, have no respect for the scriptures, yet deliberately bait and mock others who do.
However you choose to characterize challenges to blind faith is up to you. So too is it your choice not to meet such challenges by tossing-up these appeals to respect in lieu of addressing the matter of "faith" being a belief which lacks supporting evidence.
So, when you do come in some threads doing what you do, because you have the "right to be disrespectful," then anyone else will have that same right to give right back to you what you dish out, in standing up for their beliefs and for showing your ignorance and disrespect towards Christians and believers.
What are you going to do, 'disrepect' the ability to reason? Perhaps you mean to 'mock' rationality or, deride critical thinking skills? Carry on, that would be ironically-amusing.