God is a Fake

[falcon9]

Can somebody not believe in what they want nowdays? This is some bull..

That's not being disputed; anyone can choose to believe in any manner of unsubstantiated nonsense they wish.  As soon as such nonsense escapes the confines of their internal self-delusions and makes empty assertions in public, dissent may ensue.

[jcribb16]

Thank you, Sheryl.  Did you happen to notice, too, that he even disagreed with a couple of them - which is challenging the creators of their own quotes?  

  Yes, I noticed...and I could care less what he disagrees with because he's so full of hot air that it's ridiculous.  He also seems to have a ridiculous amount of time to waste on FC...    

      "He is a sophistical rhetorician, inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity, and gifted with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an interminable and inconsistent series of arguments to malign an opponent and to glorify himself." Benjamin Disraeli
    

Good quote.  You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned. 

[falcon9]

You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  [/color]

No twisting or turning was necessary on my part however, such contortions were on par for the fundies.  Imagine that.  Btw, "ignoring" someone by posting about them is approximately the level of junior high-school girl immaturity.  What's next, giggling?

Now, back to the point about fundies running away from having their unsupported opinions challenged; why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?

[jcribb16]

You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  [/color]

No twisting or turning was necessary on my part however, such contortions were on par for the fundies.  Imagine that.  Btw, "ignoring" someone by posting about them is approximately the level of junior high-school girl immaturity.  What's next, giggling?

Now, back to the point about fundies running away from having their unsupported opinions challenged; why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?

You have no room to speak.  Some people are just tired of some of the "same-o" stuff and are finally speaking out about it.  *giggle*  (since that's what you apparently wanted, lol.)

[falcon9]

You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  [/color]

No twisting or turning was necessary on my part however, such contortions were on par for the fundies.  Imagine that.  Btw, "ignoring" someone by posting about them is approximately the level of junior high-school girl immaturity.  What's next, giggling?

Now, back to the point about fundies running away from having their unsupported opinions challenged; why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?

You have no room to speak.  Some people are just tired of some of the "same-o" stuff and are finally speaking out about it.  *giggle*  (since that's what you apparently wanted, lol.)

I have plenty of room to "speak", (post as wished), here.  I see that you and a few others are still dodging the cognizant questions, (e.g., 'why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?'), by responding with non sequitors.  Apparently, the 'blind-faithers' aren't tired of that same old thing.

[Falconer02]

[SherylsShado]

  Good quote.  You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  I think he's going for the Guinness World Record for posting the most b.s. posts in a month on FC.

[falcon9]

  Good quote.  You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  

The quote under your posting 'nym is a misnomer; you're the one trolling and I'm the one feeding you that which you cannot digest.

[SherylsShado]

  Good quote.  You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  

The quote under your posting 'nym is a misnomer; you're the one trolling and I'm the one feeding you that which you cannot digest.

yah...you'd like to "think" so, wouldn't ya?

[falcon9]

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  

The quote under your posting 'nym is a misnomer; you're the one trolling and I'm the one feeding you that which you cannot digest.

yah...you'd like to "think" so, wouldn't ya?

Since the evidence that you're trolling me is right here, in this thread, (and another), it would be difficult to refute.  Of course, such trolling, (the 'talking about another' and creating inuendo may not be considered to be "trolling" by the troll doing so - that's you and Julie).  Responding to such trolling, (my "feeding the trolls"), deliberately disregards your admonishment in order to emphasize your further hypocrisy.

[SherylsShado]

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  

Since the evidence that you're trolling me is right here, in this thread, (and another), it would be difficult to refute.  Of course, such trolling, (the 'talking about another' and creating inuendo may not be considered to be "trolling" by the troll doing so - that's you and Julie).  Responding to such trolling, (my "feeding the trolls"), deliberately disregards your admonishment in order to emphasize your further hypocrisy.

Yep Julie, there it is...the "persecution-oh-poor-me" post that we KNEW was coming!!   *giggles

[falcon9]

Yep Julie, there it is...the "persecution-oh-poor-me" post that we KNEW was coming!!   *giggles

'Of course, such trolling, (the 'talking about another' and creating inuendo may not be considered to be "trolling" by the troll doing so - that's you and Julie).  Responding to such trolling, (my "feeding the trolls"), deliberately disregards your admonishment in order to emphasize your further hypocrisy.'  The only previous mention of "persecution" came from your trolling, (and subsequently referred to in this reply).

[duroz]

Nice to see the Personal Attack Monster is rearing it's ugly head (again) in more than one thread.

Two FC posters receive a in Personal Attacks here (no names mentioned; no need to - it's obvious)
MUCH to be proud of there, folks 

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  I think he's going for the Guinness World Record for posting the most b.s. posts in a month on FC.

And maybe YOU'RE going for the record for posting the most () posts that include a Personal Attack on someone.....??

[falcon9]

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  I think he's going for the Guinness World Record for posting the most b.s. posts in a month on FC.

And maybe YOU'RE going for the record for posting the most () posts that include a Personal Attack on someone.....??

That seems to be what happens most often when they run out of steam, (being unable to produce a cognizant refutation). It may be junior highschool girlish however, it doesn't qualitively add to their monthly post counts.

[jcribb16]

You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  [/color]

No twisting or turning was necessary on my part however, such contortions were on par for the fundies.  Imagine that.  Btw, "ignoring" someone by posting about them is approximately the level of junior high-school girl immaturity.  What's next, giggling?

Now, back to the point about fundies running away from having their unsupported opinions challenged; why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?

You have no room to speak.  Some people are just tired of some of the "same-o" stuff and are finally speaking out about it.  *giggle*  (since that's what you apparently wanted, lol.)

I have plenty of room to "speak", (post as wished), here.  I see that you and a few others are still dodging the cognizant questions, (e.g., 'why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?'), by responding with non sequitors.  Apparently, the 'blind-faithers' aren't tired of that same old thing.

I have gone in so many circles with you over this, falcon9 that it is obvious you accept no other answers but your own.  I have better things to do than to keep answering this same question again and again and again.  You always come back with the same answers then and you always demean me or others when we say this, by saying we aren't up to the challenge or can't provide proof.  Think whatever you want - whatever you think will make you feel that you are the one in control and know everything about this subject.  You've made yourself clear about what you think and I've made myself clear what I believe.  We will never agree on this subject unless either or both sides change their decision.  And for me, it's not happening.  For you, I'm assuming as well.  So, with that, I am not answering in circles again.

 Also, you reminded me to call you falcon9, and I am asking you to call me jcribb16.  Thanks for the courtesy of fair respect.  I wouldn't make a deal of mine if you hadn't of yours.