How To Handle Christian Persecution On FusionCash

[falcon9]

And you, sir, are doing exactly what you accuse Christians are doing.  Your "clap-trap" prejudice towards Christians is ...

Reasoned opposition through logic isn't "clap-trap".  Unreasoned, irrational, faith-based superstition is "clap-trap" because it isn't rational, logical or reasonable therefore, it isn't "exactly what xtians are doing".

[jcribb16]

And you, sir, are doing exactly what you accuse Christians are doing.  Your "clap-trap" prejudice towards Christians is ...

Reasoned opposition through logic isn't "clap-trap".  Unreasoned, irrational, faith-based superstition is "clap-trap" because it isn't rational, logical or reasonable therefore, it isn't "exactly what xtians are doing".

Who really cares what you think you are trying to say here?  I don't.

[falcon9]

And you, sir, are doing exactly what you accuse Christians are doing.  Your "clap-trap" prejudice towards Christians is ...

Reasoned opposition through logic isn't "clap-trap".  Unreasoned, irrational, faith-based superstition is "clap-trap" because it isn't rational, logical or reasonable therefore, it isn't "exactly what xtians are doing".

Who really cares what you think you are trying to say here?  I don't.

If not, why reply at all to it?  You've apparently chosen to reply to that which you don't "care" about while ignoring the 'ignore button'.  How is that rational?

[jcribb16]

And you, sir, are doing exactly what you accuse Christians are doing.  Your "clap-trap" prejudice towards Christians is ...

Reasoned opposition through logic isn't "clap-trap".  Unreasoned, irrational, faith-based superstition is "clap-trap" because it isn't rational, logical or reasonable therefore, it isn't "exactly what xtians are doing".

Who really cares what you think you are trying to say here?  I don't.

If not, why reply at all to it?  You've apparently chosen to reply to that which you don't "care" about while ignoring the 'ignore button'.  How is that rational?

Because I choose to.  Just because I don't care about your silly remarks, doesn't mean I can or can't reply to what I want.  I don't have to use the Ignore Button any more than you do.  I'm not going to let your nonsense mess up my enjoyment of this forum. 

[falcon9]

Who really cares what you think you are trying to say here?  I don't.

If not, why reply at all to it?  You've apparently chosen to reply to that which you don't "care" about while ignoring the 'ignore button'.  How is that rational?

Because I choose to.  

That establishes tht you've chosen to be irrational, which applies to your religious choice as well.  Others who've chosen to be rational instead have the same option to respond/not respond as an irrational blind faither does.

[hitch0403]

Radishes

[jcribb16]

Who really cares what you think you are trying to say here?  I don't.

If not, why reply at all to it?  You've apparently chosen to reply to that which you don't "care" about while ignoring the 'ignore button'.  How is that rational?

Because I choose to.  

That establishes tht you've chosen to be irrational, which applies to your religious choice as well.  Others who've chosen to be rational instead have the same option to respond/not respond as an irrational blind faither does.

Ha!  You are showing your own irrationality of sorts, with thinking you have to have the last word, the best and smartest huge words, with being in "control" over Christians with your intolerance and disrespect - over and over and over, when these threads are ALLOWED in this forum.  You can't block them, so you antagonize Christians.  We see right through your "irrationality" towards Christians.  That's for sure!

[dmahoney]

What makes him think he is the master of all knowledge and seer of all wisdom? 

[falcon9]

What makes him think he is the master of all knowledge and seer of all wisdom? 

Since "he" never claimed such things, what make you falsely-attribute them?  Blind religious faith?

[jcribb16]

What makes him think he is the master of all knowledge and seer of all wisdom? 

Since "he" never claimed such things, what make you falsely-attribute them?  Blind religious faith?

You don't have to claim what your behavior, attitude, and words suggest.

[falcon9]

What makes him think he is the master of all knowledge and seer of all wisdom? 

Since "he" never claimed such things, what make you falsely-attribute them?  Blind religious faith?

You don't have to claim what your behavior, attitude, and words suggest.

It remains that baseless accusations by religious zealots with no understanding of logical reasoning or evidence have no substance.

[jcribb16]

What makes him think he is the master of all knowledge and seer of all wisdom? 

Since "he" never claimed such things, what make you falsely-attribute them?  Blind religious faith?

You don't have to claim what your behavior, attitude, and words suggest.

It remains that baseless accusations by religious zealots with no understanding of logical reasoning or evidence have no substance.

Don't flatter yourself.  You know what you want to be seen as in this forum.  Stop with the lies, anyway - your remark, while your opinion, is false.

[falcon9]

You don't have to claim what your behavior, attitude, and words suggest.

It remains that baseless accusations by religious zealots with no understanding of logical reasoning or evidence have no substance.

Stop with the lies, anyway -

The remark contained no lies; 'It remains that baseless accusations by religious zealots with no understanding of logical reasoning or evidence have no substance' is a factually-accurate statement.  There is abdundant posted and off-forum evidence to substantiate it and no valid evidence to contradict it, (again, the unsupported 'opinions' of religious zealots do not constitute valid evidence).  Therefore, your contention that the remark was "lies" is false and a lie itself.

- your remark, while your opinion, is false.

Again, theremark is substantiated by evidence and is neither an "opinion" relying on no evidence, (like your false accusation remark), nor is false merely because you claim it is, (again, without evidence since an 'opinion' lacking evidence is exactly like blind religious faith; irrational and null).

[jcribb16]

You don't have to claim what your behavior, attitude, and words suggest.

It remains that baseless accusations by religious zealots with no understanding of logical reasoning or evidence have no substance.

Stop with the lies, anyway -

The remark contained no lies; 'It remains that baseless accusations by religious zealots with no understanding of logical reasoning or evidence have no substance' is a factually-accurate statement.  There is abdundant posted and off-forum evidence to substantiate it and no valid evidence to contradict it, (again, the unsupported 'opinions' of religious zealots do not constitute valid evidence).  Therefore, your contention that the remark was "lies" is false and a lie itself.

- your remark, while your opinion, is false.

Again, theremark is substantiated by evidence and is neither an "opinion" relying on no evidence, (like your false accusation remark), nor is false merely because you claim it is, (again, without evidence since an 'opinion' lacking evidence is exactly like blind religious faith; irrational and null).

And again, unless you experience the true nature of God in your heart, you have no idea what you are speaking of.  Of course it's irrational and null to the blind ones who choose not to see the light of Christ. 

[falcon9]

And again, unless you experience the ...

Your repetitious logical fallacy deserves the same response as before; it is not necessary to experience drowning to know that it wouldn't be conducive to living.