Why are some people Nasty?

[jcribb16]

They have lost the sense of respect to others no matter your religion, your thoughts, your race, or what is of importance to you. They interject they opinion any where they see fit!

Thank you for that!  The key to what you are saying is "respect."  I agree that people are all free to express their own opinions courteously, since not all people believe the same or think the same.  It is when opinions are intolerant and discourteous, that things become contentious and "nasty." 

No one should look down on someone else because they don't agree with what they think or do - that is putting themselves high on a pedestal, when they are not any better than anyone else for their differing views, no matter what they are, such as in politics, race (like you said,) religion (like you said,) economics, voting for leaders, careers, and more. 

[falcon9]

I agree that people are all free to express their own opinions courteously, since not all people believe the same or think the same.  It is when opinions are intolerant and discourteous, that things become contentious and "nasty." 

In that case, such empty opinions as xtians express as proselytizing blind faith are "intolerant and discourteous" of those who reject such mind-deafness with an ability to reason.  Such things are "contentious" only insofar as the inability of religious adherents to recognize the "nasty" and insidious nature of their evangelical propaganda.  There's no obligation to be 'courteous' regarding a religious belief which is directly responsible for so much misery and death in human history without being hypocritical.

No one should look down on someone else because they don't agree with what they think or do - that is putting themselves high on a pedestal, when they are not any better than anyone else for their differing views, no matter what they are, such as in politics, race (like you said,) religion (like you said,) economics, voting for leaders, careers, and more. 

Since that's essentially what religious adherents do when they promote non-reasoning blind faith and disparage rationality, (by  choosing to embrace irrationality).  I have defended, (and will continue to defend), the option of some to choose illogic over logic and irrational belief over reason however, I also stand resolute against the results of such an unreasoned position.

[ghunter]

They are just nasty, people are just dirty and if they cannot follow the house rules t they need to get out.

[falcon9]

They are just nasty, people are just dirty and if they cannot follow the house rules t they need to get out.

Unfortunately for others, (and 'fortunately' for you xtian fundies), there are no "house rules" against "nasty"/insidious religious proselytization.

[duroz]

NOTE to everyone who has posted here about "nasty people" in regard to:
respect/lack of, differing opinions/views, courtesy/lack of, tolerance/intolerance,  people thinking they're better than others, etc., etc., etc.

This thread about "nasty" people, was started with the word "nasty" being used (in this thread) to describe "dirty/untidy" people....

The OP wasn't referring to any personality types, or people's behavior. 

[nidia1992]

no morals, or they simple don't care 

[falcon9]

NOTE to everyone who has posted here about "nasty people" in regard to:
respect/lack of, differing opinions/views, courtesy/lack of, tolerance/intolerance,  people thinking they're better than others, etc., etc., etc.

This thread about "nasty" people, was started with the word "nasty" being used (in this thread) to describe "dirty/untidy" people....

While that's true, the word has other connotations which accounts for the subject drift which occurred.

The OP wasn't referring to any personality types, or people's behavior. 

Actually, they were - even within the context of "dirty/untidy" behaviour inherently stemming from different personality types.  In this regard, the segues into such personality types, (such as the insidiously-"nasty" proselytizing of religious beliefs), and people's behaviour, (evangelizing superstitious nonsense), of 'nasty-minded' fundies.  Plus, this is the d+d subforum, which makes the subject debatable and open to discussion.

[narv]

Maybe they're santimonious nasty religious fundies.

Wow, you really have an ax to grind, don't you.  Try discussing the topic at hand. EDIT: I just read the other posts, and I see some of your explanation, but you did intentionally deviate from the topic early on when it was obvious what was being discussed (particularly from the first post).

My opinion (of the topic at hand, of course) is that they just become lazy and stop cleaning up either because they no longer have the time (or no longer think they have the time) to do so, or because they don't feel like investing the effort is going to pay off. I know that I have let my apartment become a mess when I don't spend much time there, and usually when I am there I am in a hurry. It is not that I am intentionally disgusting, on the contrary, I much prefer to have my apartment clean and organized. However, cleaning/organizing often takes more time than I am able (actually willing) to proffer.

[duroz]

NOTE to everyone who has posted here about "nasty people" in regard to:
respect/lack of, differing opinions/views, courtesy/lack of, tolerance/intolerance,  people thinking they're better than others, etc., etc., etc.

This thread about "nasty" people, was started with the word "nasty" being used (in this thread) to describe "dirty/untidy" people....

While that's true, the word has other connotations which accounts for the subject drift which occurred.

Well........DUH!!

The OP wasn't referring to any personality types, or people's behavior.  

Actually, they were - even within the context of "dirty/untidy" behaviour inherently stemming from different personality types.  In this regard, the segues into such personality types, (such as the insidiously-"nasty" proselytizing of religious beliefs), and people's behaviour, (evangelizing superstitious nonsense), of 'nasty-minded' fundies.  

Right then.
Sorry - my error.  When I said people's behavior and personality types, I was referring to those that others may consider inconsiderate, mean, abusive, overbearing, etc.

Plus, this is the d+d subforum, which makes the subject debatable and open to discussion.

REALLY??  


Yes, I'm well aware of that.......

       * OR *

   MAYBE I AM




And I certainly didn't mean to imply that the subject WASN'T debatable and/or open to discussion, I was simply making mention of what the thread had originally been started about.  

[anthonym1000]

because they are alone inside outside or both 

[falcon9]

Wow, you really have an ax to grind, don't you.  Try discussing the topic at hand. EDIT: I just read the other posts, and I see some of your explanation, but you did intentionally deviate from the topic early on when it was obvious what was being discussed (particularly from the first post).

The "deviation" was warranted due to prior experience with the xtian the related context was posted to.  Admittedly, this was not obviously apparent, especially to new members just joining the 'program already in progress'.

[jcribb16]

NOTE to everyone who has posted here about "nasty people" in regard to:
respect/lack of, differing opinions/views, courtesy/lack of, tolerance/intolerance,  people thinking they're better than others, etc., etc., etc.

This thread about "nasty" people, was started with the word "nasty" being used (in this thread) to describe "dirty/untidy" people....

The OP wasn't referring to any personality types, or people's behavior. 

Good point, actually.  Then that would refer to the "sanctimonious" comments immediately made against "Christians," which totally deviated from the topic intended.  Thank you for pointing that out!!

[jcribb16]

NOTE to everyone who has posted here about "nasty people" in regard to:
respect/lack of, differing opinions/views, courtesy/lack of, tolerance/intolerance,  people thinking they're better than others, etc., etc., etc.

This thread about "nasty" people, was started with the word "nasty" being used (in this thread) to describe "dirty/untidy" people....

While that's true, the word has other connotations which accounts for the subject drift which occurred.

Well........DUH!!

The OP wasn't referring to any personality types, or people's behavior.  

Actually, they were - even within the context of "dirty/untidy" behaviour inherently stemming from different personality types.  In this regard, the segues into such personality types, (such as the insidiously-"nasty" proselytizing of religious beliefs), and people's behaviour, (evangelizing superstitious nonsense), of 'nasty-minded' fundies.  

Right then.
Sorry - my error.  When I said people's behavior and personality types, I was referring to those that others may consider inconsiderate, mean, abusive, overbearing, etc.

Plus, this is the d+d subforum, which makes the subject debatable and open to discussion.

REALLY??  


Yes, I'm well aware of that.......

       * OR *

   MAYBE I AM




And I certainly didn't mean to imply that the subject WASN'T debatable and/or open to discussion, I was simply making mention of what the thread had originally been started about.  

Great points made.

[falcon9]

Then that would refer to the "sanctimonious" comments immediately made against "Christians,"

No, that would refer to xtians spouting-off sanctimonious religiously-based 'opinions' which are considered to be inherently "nasty".

... which totally deviated from the topic intended. 

They didn't deviate "totally" since the word "nasty" has different contextual connotations, (one of which was remarked upon after a faith-blinded xtian commented).

[2getherwewin]

 SOME PEOPLE REALLY DON'T KNOW THAT THERE OR NASTY.  WHEN THEY HAVE JUNK  CARS  ALL AROUND THERE HOME FOR 20 YEARS IT BECOME'S NORMAL FOR THEM