God is a Fake

[jcribb16]

You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  [/color]

No twisting or turning was necessary on my part however, such contortions were on par for the fundies.  Imagine that.  Btw, "ignoring" someone by posting about them is approximately the level of junior high-school girl immaturity.  What's next, giggling?

Now, back to the point about fundies running away from having their unsupported opinions challenged; why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?

You have no room to speak.  Some people are just tired of some of the "same-o" stuff and are finally speaking out about it.  *giggle*  (since that's what you apparently wanted, lol.)

I have plenty of room to "speak", (post as wished), here.  I see that you and a few others are still dodging the cognizant questions, (e.g., 'why is it that blind faith is a _requirement_ of religious beliefs?'), by responding with non sequitors.  Apparently, the 'blind-faithers' aren't tired of that same old thing.

Well, pardon me.  I will change it to "You have no room to judge..."

[SherylsShado]

jcribb:  "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." - anon

[jcribb16]

  Good quote.  You know it will be turned and twisted and made into a new quote to make it "appear" that he's the actual one being maligned.  

maligned & persecuted, wah-wah...  

The quote under your posting 'nym is a misnomer; you're the one trolling and I'm the one feeding you that which you cannot digest.

yah...you'd like to "think" so, wouldn't ya?

Wow!  He thinks you are trolling?  I should check with a couple of other posters who would think that is what he has done with them, going into several groups behind them, continuing his (what they would call) trolling.  It seems to me the digestion with him is giving him reflux of words.

[falcon9]

"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." - anon

I don't really mind doing so since you haven't managed to drag me anyway and your experience isn't benefiting you significantly.  Some would maintain that there's a certain degree of futitlity involved in arguing with irrational persons however, such can be a learning experience for those whose minds haven't entirely been 'blinded by the light'.

[jcribb16]

"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." - anon

I don't really mind doing so since you haven't managed to drag me anyway and your experience isn't benefiting you significantly.  Some would maintain that there's a certain degree of futitlity involved in arguing with irrational persons however, such can be a learning experience for those whose minds haven't entirely been 'blinded by the light'.

*playing little violin*

[falcon9]

Wow!  He thinks you are trolling?

The trolling consists of several posts made specifically to 'talk around' anotehr member.  These exist in more than one thread as evidence of trolling. 

I should check with a couple of other posters who would think that is what he has done with them, going into several groups behind them, continuing his (what they would call) trolling. 

They aren't other "groups"; they're other forums within FC, (specifically the off topic and D+D ones).  In those forums, responses are posted to several empty assertions made in order to challenge them.  This is not considered to be "trolling" under the definition of that term, (no matter how some quasi-martyred ones misperceive it).

It seems to me the digestion with him is giving him reflux of words.

My refutations differ from the ones who cannot digest them in that they are refutations.

[falcon9]

*playing little violin*

"You can lead a horse to water but, you can't make them drink."  My condolences that your 'horse' has become so dehydrated.

[jcribb16]

jcribb:  "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." - anon

The only thing is, with this, is there is no experience of understanding true faith as a believer in God.  So this one would be beating us with an empty round of nothing except for a recording of the same big words.  I'll strictly adhere to my faith - I agree arguing will do nothing more than drag down and annoy others.  

[duroz]

Also, you reminded me to call you falcon9, and I am asking you to call me jcribb16.  Thanks for the courtesy of fair respect.  I wouldn't make a deal of mine if you hadn't of yours.[/color]

Uhhhhh...........the request (below) from falcon9 was to use the CORRECT "NAME"......because you addressed him as just "falcon"

it's "falcon9", (so as to avoid conflating respondants)

Just pointing out that your point that you were "making a deal of yours" because falcon9 did.......well.......
it MAKES NO SENSE!

[falcon9]

The only thing is, with this, is there is no experience of understanding true faith as a believer in God.

On the contrary, such blind "faith" isn't difficult to comprehend as it consists merely of the circularity of believing because one has faith. 

So this one would be beating us with an empty round of nothing except for a recording of the same big words.  

Which words were "too big" to understand; 'circularity' or 'comprehend'?

I'll strictly adhere to my faith - I agree arguing will do nothing more than drag down and annoy others.  

Conversely, such strict adherence to blind faith while declining to admit the inherent irrationality involved can emphasize the very thing 'believers' wish to avoid.

[duroz]

jcribb:  "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." - anon

Poster receives a in NAME CALLING

[SherylsShado]

On the contrary, such blind "faith" isn't difficult to comprehend as it consists merely of the circularity of believing because one has faith. 

Which words were "too big" to understand; 'circularity' or 'comprehend'?

Conversely, such strict adherence to blind faith while declining to admit the inherent irrationality involved can emphasize the very thing 'believers' wish to avoid.

Such a criticism of others is ironic; moreso when an inaccurate intent is assumed, ("... to try and make the other person feel bad just because you don't happen to feel the same way").

[falcon9]

Well, pardon me.  I will change it to "You have no room to judge..."[/color]

Everyone judges, that includes us.  Although your judgement that I "have no room to judge" is a baseless assertion.

[SherylsShado]

jcribb:  "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." - anon

Poster receives a in NAME CALLING

ERROR---that quote wasn't from jcribb, troll.

[jcribb16]

Wow!  He thinks you are trolling?

The trolling consists of several posts made specifically to 'talk around' anotehr member.  These exist in more than one thread as evidence of trolling. 

I should check with a couple of other posters who would think that is what he has done with them, going into several groups behind them, continuing his (what they would call) trolling. 

They aren't other "groups"; they're other forums within FC, (specifically the off topic and D+D ones).  In those forums, responses are posted to several empty assertions made in order to challenge them.  This is not considered to be "trolling" under the definition of that term, (no matter how some quasi-martyred ones misperceive it).

It seems to me the digestion with him is giving him reflux of words.

My refutations differ from the ones who cannot digest them in that they are refutations.

"Talking around?"  Oh yeah, like you and Falconer do;  you and duroz do;  etc.  Forgot to check the mote in your own eye first, did you.

Following others in other groups (or threads as I would normally say since you wish to be so technical) isn't trolling to you?  Okay, then we'll go back to the term "following" (where some thought "stalking" was the better word.)

Your refutations are not clear refutations of what refutations you say others can't digest when you are making such refutations yourself....