I knew what you meant with that first sentence. You have pointed out my grammatical or otherwise errors, so I figured I would make sure of what you really meant. Also, please don't bring the Mardi Gras comment about my "righteous *bleep*" into the picture, please.
If you knew what I meant, you'd also realize that the Mardi Gras beads and all were metaphorical, (you know, like the "babies" in another thread?).
I've not tried to bully you into silence. You could ignore the thread, or just say you don't pray or believe in prayer but hope all will be okay.
Encouraging the ignoring of a subject or, a modified reply to it is censorous. Unless the off-topic posting guidelines established by FC are violated, I can 'respectfully' decline your stifling suggestion.
This remark you made:[/color] "having respect for other person's is not equated with having respect for whatever nonsense they believe." is most definitely not having respect or courtesy by calling their beliefs nonsense.
Thank you for demonstrating, in your own words, your failure to grasp the distinction between a person and their beliefs. A belief is not a person.
There is no inherent requirement to "respect" beliefs which lack any supporting evidence. Such beliefs cannot be conflated with the persons holding them unless by way of an irrational causality, (although there is considerable philosophical dispute regarding whether or not a 'belief system' _is_ part of a person or, a concept they adhere to).
It is not nonsense to them. It is what they believe, personally.
Conversely, 'nonsense' consists of that which doesn't make sense. That which doesn't make sense can consist of baseless beliefs. A person who holds baseless beliefs, (no matter how 'true' they presume them to be), has blind faith if such lacks substantiating evidence to support them. Believing something expressly _because_ it lacks any evidence, (i.e., "faith"), is irrational nonsense. I'm not contending that the person holding those beliefs is entirely irrational; it may be selective or, widespread - either way, my comments concerned their beliefs and not them, personally.
Give reasons why you DISAGREE with them, but the NAME CALLING of their beliefs ...
I have, repeatedly, (from your previous replies to such posts containing the reasons, you're aware of them). The "name-calling" misnomer was addressed in the paragraph prior to this one.
You may not agree with them but don't be hateful about it - that just stirs up strife. I don't agree with some of your views, but I don't call them nonsense or any other thing, because that is your belief, you are entitled to what you believe based on what you know or see or learn.
You are mistaken in that my rational skepticism is not a "belief" or, a 'belief system'. For the record however, you most certainly have denigrated logical reasoning by characterizing it's usage as "The constant unaccepting of one side over the other, with the same "baseless" and "empty" words ..." -Quote from: jcribb16 on 03:09:12 at 08:35:34 (as well as message ID#502202).