I don't usually post a whole lot on this forum, but felt the need to chime in here with what seems to be an unpopular perspective.
Conversely, the kind ones would call me a 'prolific' poster, (while the unkind ones have other names for my remarks and me). Nonetheless, I chose to respond to your post in my usual interleaved manner so, don't take it personally, aye?
I am a Christian, baptized as a child and wholeheartedly believe in Jesus dying for ALL of our sins. We all sin. And none of us are to judge. Period.
Since you go on to point out below the overt judging that you also are engaging in, it may seem superfluous to mention that we all "judge". That's right; everytime someone walks down a dark street alone, they're attempting to judge whether or not that 'shadow' lurking in the corners of the night has hostile intent or, is just a cat. People judge others all the time. Without judgement, there is no discernment. Without discernment, there are no preferences. Without preferences, we'd all like or dislike exactly the same things/people. We don't do so, we make judgements based on the available information or,
previous judgements made, then make decisions based upon such judgements.
An admonishment from a dubious religious source would have its followers eschew discernment and reasoning and judge nothing, (people or situations). I choose to eschew such religious admonishments in favor of using my skull for something more than a place to keep my hair atop.
I just can't understand Christians telling others they are wrong or don't deserve equal rights "According to the Bible," when the very act they are displaying, calling someone else out & choosing to judge their life is exactly WRONG "According to the Bible." (Ok, I guess some could argue I'm judging those who are judging but I don't know how else to express the true message of God, & I don't mean to judge because I used to feel the same way as many of you ...
Logically, it isn't possible to 'not-judge' while judging as the two are mutually-exclusive positions to take.
That's right, there is nobody without sin.
That's an inherently presumptuous and sanctimonious assertion because it relies upon a irrationally-weighted religious 'concept' not shared by everyone else, (the presumed authority of a 'divine law', itself being without rational basis and relying wholly upon "faith" - which means 'a belief without evidence'). The entire ediface is built upon nothing substantial.
We are also told "judge, lest thee be judged" as in, we will be judged w/ the same measure of severity that we judge others. It's this mentality that drives people from God when our biggest, most important job above all is to show unconditional love as God loves to every single human being no matter who they are or what they believe.
How about "no matter what they"
don't believe as well? Numerous xtian 'believers' have repeatedly 'attack' disbelieving challengers to their religious beliefs, (rather than debate the
challenges themselves to any great depth.
It's anyones right to say what they believe, but I take it personally I guess when it's purpose is to strip someone of basic rights, based on our own judgement, all done in the name of God.
By the same "right", anyone who doesn't believe as a matter of blind faith can "say"/write about their dissenting position as well. Otherwise, that's tacitly supporting suppressing such dissent in favor of the beliefs of religious adherents.