Whether "he gets away with more than anyone" is a matter of opinion. Clearly, he hasn't done anything against FC rules/policies or he wouldn't be here. FC has provided an "ignore" button, if people refuse to use it it's no one's problem but their own. I don't agree with what she did at all. But he came after her to give her a "dose" of her own medicine, and in doing so, caused a thread to derail. So to you, that was okay? The consequences of his actions, too, affected the innocent in that thread. Yet, dare I come into a thread and say anything? Especially when he went BACK in there "re-scolding" me like I'm a kid, and when the scolding applied to him, too? What happened to your extreme fairness of looking at both sides?
I teased him about it because I was surprised he would chase down someone for a "multiple chirp post" after so patiently tolerating all the "call-out"/"beat-down" posts on him. My post to him isn't against any FC rules/policies. If people don't wish others to think they are hilarious in the forums then maybe they should act like they have some sense.
I had saw what that member did in her "multiple chirp" post and thinking she was so funny "mocking" him. I guess we should all turn our heads and act like THAT didn't happen? She didn't like reaping what her actions sowed and I'm the one that is supposed to be sorry? She started it, she got a taste of her own medicine and didn't like it. Hopefully she's learned a lesson about spamming in forums. Falcon's reply to me on pg.1, he stated "this reply was not intended to rekindle an old 'flame'" which meant that even though I brought it up and he offered an explanation of the situation, he wasn't trying to "stir it up again". So what's the point of following him in here, 'rekindling the flames' unless it was to 'keep the fire burning'?
To say "yet it seems it's fine for him to carry on about it"---he wasn't carrying on about it. I teased him, he stated what his intentions for his reply was and we were done with it. You and jj followed him in here and pratically turned this thread into another "beat down" on falcon thread. And you expect me to back you on that? I can't. He had good reason to 'go after' "chirpy" and while the outcome was an unfortunate one, a person has to think before they act or the consequences of their actions may affect the innocent.
Now...BACK to favorite Bible stories....
To answer your questions---
Nothing happened to my "extreme fairness at looking at both sides".
I've NEVER believed that "two wrongs make a right".
The FIRST FC forum rule is "Observe the golden rule, Treat others as you would like to be treated".
If someone feels like going into a thread, mocking someone else and posting a ridiculous number of "chirps" then it's obviously because that is how that person WOULD LIKE to be treated by others---so falcon obliged. Falcon didn't cause that thread to "de-rail", those that didn't have the sense to use their 'ignore' button DID. The matter was between Falcon and the person that started her "chirpy" nonsense. If you and the others had used the ignore button, things would have stayed that way.
But it's more fun to simply "throw down the toys and run out of the thread crying" isn't it? More drama that way, hmmm??? Chase falcon into a into a topic entitled "the Bible"
where others are posting their favorite Bible stories and cause a disruption to simply "bash" him, you keep on trying to cause this thread to "de-rail" (the SAME thing you've accused him of already doing in a different thread), but it's supposed to be A-O.K. if you do it?
Falcon has resorted to repeatedly using "beating a dead horse" icon, so apparently he "gets it". Apparently you just wish to keep dragging this drama on and on and ON. That isn't "right", it isn't "Christian-like" and I don't support the beating of dead horses (or live ones). I do heartily support using the "ignore" button for those that insist on beating a dead horse "to death" though.